Sarah Palin changed her mind about a bridge. Barack Obama changed his mind about campaign finance.

Who’s making change? REAL change? Yes folks it is the new wave, 4th wave feminists, who have kept up the pressure on Letterman and his advertisers. Tonight, according to this report at Live Feed, David Letterman has again apologized for his misogyny--this time without smirking, so a birdy says.
Here is an except:

David Letterman re-addressed the controversy surrounding his jokes about Sarah Palin's family during the taping of CBS' "Late Show" on Monday.

FemiSex has written exhaustively about media bias against women. About one year ago, a woman was being screamed at to leave a race she was winning. Then came Palin and we all know what happened to her. If you don’t believe the media did a hit job on HRC and Governor Palin then you do believe in talking, flying pigs.

FemiSex loves to dissect the small but effective examples of media bias against women. In sad remembrance:

Remember when the New Yorker and Slate and Salon put Palin in a bikini? Well there is solid evidence why they did so—to turn a female candidate into a tool, literally! The media plan was to demean Palin and to whip up anti-woman sentiment; the media knows exactly how to pander to sexual stereotypes.
For example, a recent study found:

“Sexy women in bikinis really do inspire some men to see them as objects, according to a new study of male behavior.

Sarah Palin is planning to turn down nearly 30% of the funds provided to Alaska in the federal stimulus package including money directed for education. She is also at odds with the state legislature. The legislature says it will go around Pailin to get the funds . Who's in charge here?

Plug in Palin AND Morgan Christen on the New York Times search button and you will get no mention of the fact that Gov. Palin bucked pressure from within her party and has appointed a pro-choice female to Alaska’s Supreme Court.

What IS all over the MSM news about Palin? Yes, her daughter’s split with her significant other. Which story is more important to women and policy? Duh?
Which story will tell reader what they ought to know about a woman who may be on the TOP of the ticket in 2012? How is it possible the Times has NOT covered this??

Let’s talk sexism bias by the press? Compare coverage of Obama’s BiG FAT Lie on Earmarks to Palin’s Bride to Nowhere. And the Price of this Sexism Bias to Americans: a Trillion of so bucks, give or take a few billion.

“Understand, this bill does not have a single earmark in it, which is unprecedented for a bill of this size, does not have a single earmark in it," Obama said…er LIED as he spoke to Americans in an attempt to sell his Spending/stimulus Bill of Pork to Americans.

Now...Let’s time travel.

Well well well, Palin won’t push for anti-abortion legislation and Obama is dragging his feet on pro-choice reforms.

Both Reds and Blues are using my uterus as a political football. Will women ever make them stop?

Re Palin:
Regarding Two antiabortion bills recently reintroduced in the Alaskan state Legislature:
-------------------------------