Evidently Salon dot com has it's Liberal Dude Nation jockstrap in a twist because an angry man USA called Elisabeth Warren a "socialist whore." Hmmm, where do they think the man got his OK to call women who want power whores?

or if not liberal dude nation Randi Rhodes how about Dem Dog Moondog, Jerry Brown calling his female rival a whore:

http://abcnews.go.com/Politics/meg-whitman-called-whore-jerry-brown-phon...

I have decided to Occupy the Rich and here are a list of my demands:
I want a salary equal to that of my boss.
I want Susan Sarandon's home. (She can live in the basement, why be greedy?)
I want Michael Moore to pay off my student loan.
I want Barack Obama to take his girls out of private school so I can enroll mine in their stead.
I want to anchor the five o'clock news.
I want George Clooney to date women his own age and drive my car while I drive his.
I want Barack Hussein Obama to forgive my any traffic ticket I may ever get.

Here is something obnoxious from Salon.com editor and misogynist Joan Walsh:

"She's [Bachmann] trying to make this -- and they're all trying to make this about the economy. So they're thinking that's really going to be the club with which to batter President Obama," Salon.com editor Joan Walsh said.
"You know, the more people dig into her background, her foster kids, there's just a lot that is not known about her," Walsh continued. "

It is infuriating when progressives incite class warfare and what better way to do so that by insisting race not economics determine the fabric of a neighborhood. There is nothing more American than working very hard to be able to afford a nice home. Pretending that blacks or Hispanics are kept out of Westchester neighborhoods (as Salon does today) because of racism is sickening. If you can afford to live in the upscale neighborhoods of Westchester you can. Period.

Only the most dodo-headed person would say that "In the run up to the midterm elections...a bevy of conservative female candidates ...became media darlings. " What idiot would say such a thing?? You guessed it: Salon.coms' anti-women writers.
Oh sure... the article is a lament to women's lack of progress, but like a rapist taking about how rape hurts women the piece was written by those who contributed to women's of lack of progress.

"Nearly two-thirds of Americans say the health care overhaul signed into law last week costs too much and expands the government's role in health care too far, a USA TODAY/Gallup Poll finds, underscoring an uphill selling job ahead for President Obama and congressional Democrats.

Obama's approval rating was 47%-50% — the first time his disapproval rating has hit 50%."~USA Today

http://www.usatoday.com/news/washington/2010-03-29-health-poll_N.htm
---------------------------------------------

Barbara Ehrenreich wrote this during the primaries about Hillary Clinton:
“Clinton didn't just break through the "glass floor," she set a new low for floors in general, and would, if she could have gotten within arm's reach, have rubbed the broken glass into Obama's face.”
This week Ehrenreich falsely writes:

Routine mammographic screening of women under 50 does not reduce breast cancer mortality in that group...

Sexism is so freakn’ complicated. It roots itself in our pores and oozes out of us when we are not looking, even when we are actively trying to fight the devil that is sexism. FemiSex has long railed at liberal sexism exhibited by our comics. The fact that our cultural arbiters are “funny” men and women for whom racism is off limits but sexism is manna from heaven is one of the ways that sexism lives in our subcutaneous layers. Our culture sensitivities are so hard to flesh out and flush away.