Marilyn Monroe is a hero of mine. I won’t go into all the details here, but let’s just say that in a world that insisted that women be who they should be not who they wanted to be, Marilyn Monroe gave it her all to become who she wanted to be. The New York Times will NEVER write a piece that accurately portrays what Ms. Monroe sacrificed to be more than, but they do allow themselves a sentence here and there that speaks volumes:
“Monroe continued to yearn for a role like Juliet or Grushenka, but diretors saw her as Sugar or Lorelei.” And because directors had the power, the world ONLY saw Ms. Monroe as a bimbo.
But....it is sometimes just too damn hard to paint women who want to be MORE THAN as bimbo—Hillary Clinton—and her sensible shoes just won’t allow even the most daring sexist to venture down than path. (The fool fashion “journalist” Robin Givhan from the sexist WAPO did take a shot at talking about Hillary’s boobs, but it was just so outlandish that no matter the dream, painting Hillary down Bimbo Way was not gonna work. ) So Matthews just put horn on Hillary and followed the Hillary is bitch stampede. (The picture accompanying this story is from the Crooks and Liars imaginings. Crooks and Liars is an American liberal blog founded by John Amato.)
But, take a Governor from Alaska who is not over 60, or…a Congresswoman from Minnesota who is a lawyer and also not over 60, and sexist liberal media is free to typecast them as Sugar or Lorelei or whatever other bimbo character you come up with and….you have a sexist-win: the ability to turn any woman with reasonable level of agreed-upon attractiveness as a bimbo. This is the Left’s modus operandi and YET again we see it at work.
Bigot Chris Matthews at his daily sexism:.
Chris Matthews, who cast Hillary as the Devil and Palin as Bimbo is now furious with a woman who also wills to power: Michele Bachmann. He has called her a “balloon head” for suggesting that the Founding Fathers might not have wanted a country forever bound by slavery.
“How to you put someone forward who is a balloon head,” asks Matthews.
Matthews screams {on his show} that Bachmann is too stupid know history, but as Big Journalism points out, Bachmann’s words were fully correct, as she particularly mentions Founders who did work for the end of slavery.
From Big Journalism:
{Bachmann} also mentioning John Adams’ son, John Quincy Adams specifically by name, and that he continued to work until the blight of slavery became a thing of the past in America.
From Big Journalism:
But it’s Chris Matthews that needs to bone up on his American History, not Rep. Bachmann. As a Founder and the second President, it’s true that John Adams put the Republic above what was then an impossible issue to resolve. It is inaccurate to suggest he was a proponent of slavery with no role in its ultimately being eliminated in the U.S. No, he did not sacrifice the forming of a Republic for it, which is precisely what a strong position against it would have meant. But he did make his sentiments known (for more), taking pride in never having employed a slave. He is said to have found it “repugnant” and he argued against the Southern position that blacks not be included in population figures during the Continental Congress. In short, he did what he could without sacrificing the greater cause at the time.
Matthews could start here. Adams, the Founder’s son, did precisely what Bachmann claimed. Obviously she mentioned him for a reason. It’s Matthews who seems utterly uninformed as regards the pertinent bit of American History.
What did John Quincy Adams do to help end slavery?
John Quincy Adams was a strong opponent of slavery and used the various positions he held to promote abolition of slavery. As president he proposed programs that would lead to an end to slavery, but was unable to get it through Congress. Later in life, as a Congressman, he argued that if a civil war ever broke out the president could abolish slavery by using his war powers, a policy followed by President Abraham Linclon (Emancipation Proclamation 1863) who eventually succeeded.
And then Matthews should read through some of the over 340,000 links pointing out how John Quincy Adams’, continuing the work of his father, Founder John Adams, worked in opposition to slavery throughout his lifetime, which is precisely what Bachmann claimed. The fight to end slavery did not begin and end with Abraham Lincoln, nor should a Founder and his legacy be dismissed by Matthews for crude and un-civil sound-bytes. Maybe he wants Olbermann’s slot on the MSLSD network? Clearly Bachmann has a more informed and nuanced understanding of American History than does he.
But hey, the Truth is far less important than making sure you plant the seed of bimbo to keep women in their place.
I don’t know much about Michele Bachmann, but here is a bit of her bio:
Congresswoman Bachmann is a graduate of Anoka High School and Winona State University. After earning her law degree, she went on to the College of William and Mary to get an LLM in tax law.
Yeah, doesn’t sound like she’s a bamboo, Sugar or Lorelei, but …hey Chris Matthews is setting the stage for you all to buy into this sexist smear.
Funny how nothing has REALLY changed since Ms. Monroe's time. We women are still told that we MUST be Sugar, or Lorelei, or ...if that doesn't work, then Nurse Ratchet and the 50-foot tall power-hungry Bitch that is Hillary, as per media liberal sexism. How about the idea that feminism allows women to be MORE THAN without being told they are bitches or bimbos or ...if you are really lucky...both. See above picture from a liberal web site that is exactly degressive for women's equality.
http://bigjournalism.com/driehl/2011/01/25/michele-bachman-gives-chris-m...
Comments
Pothole, an individual with
Pothole, an individual with negative worth. That would be Barack. His assention came about only because of sexism. Barack Hussein Obama ushered in the Golden age of accepted misogny and his minions (malcontent boy)who troll feminist web sites to argue for continued misogny. Sickening. Since Boy doesn't mind sexism let's all call Barack a foolish monkey. After all words change and lots of folk use the word monkey in ways other than to refer to our current Monkey in Chief - non-Curoius Geroge Obama.
If she was right in this
If she was right in this instance, Michelle Bachmann has made plenty other comments that warrant her being called bimbo, balloonhead or even the more male oriented term jack-ass. Usually I just call her an "a$$h#le," which is what I call men and women alike if I think they fit the bill. That said, I've witnessed more than a few male bimbos, (Rush Limbaugh, Glenn Beck) and I think the term has taken on significance beyond merely a feminine put down.
MB: at the end of the day you
MB: at the end of the day you say: "I don't think you should call anyone a nigger. " Yet....your entire argument here is an apology for MSM who use sexism and sexist terms.
That is sad!
Reading your further posts, I agree with the others who say you are doing the black distraction thing: rather that have women unite over the outrage of sexism, you seem to want to change the discussion to "hey, sexism is not really sexism so don't get your panties in a twist.'
It is nice for blacks that no one on MSM calls blacks niggers. You have won. Women have lost. We are called B, S, W daily by MSM. Women are constantly framed as dumb bimbos and sexualized by media. Women are violated daily by sexism and killed daily by sexism, raped daily by sexism. And now we get the absolute treat of black men saying hey, sexism is just gettn' wit the times. Feminists spent years denoucing anything racist, obvious or implied. Shame on you, MB.
Women should see through you and JUST SAY NO to SEXISM and NEVER argue with those who want to socialize women into accepting sexism.
I'll end with a call for the VERY sexist Matthews (who btw, constantly promotes Obama) to change tack and constantly frame Obama (and other black pols) aa foolish monkey niggers and then we'll hear back from you.
I'll give you a boatload of bucks if you think he is just being, ya know, gettn ' wit the changing times.
Thanks to the readers who enlightened me to MB's attempt to change the discussion thread.
I've witnessed more than a
I've witnessed more than a few white niggers and i think the term has taken on significance beyond merely African American put down.
I think you're absolutely
I think you're absolutely correct.
I've come up with a term I
I've come up with a term I like that is gender neutral: pothole. It can be used for those whose worth is a negative. Our readers tend to like jack ass or asshole, both gender neutral. As for (I'm sorry, but it is inane) the inane suggestion that bimbo has a "significance beyond merely a feminine put down" then I would try to bring "no account nigger'--which IS gender neutral back into mainstream use to prove your point...get mine? The picture I featured on this post, which is from a Lefy web site that the MSM has put front and center as an adored web site, is all the evidence you need that bimbo/bitch is saved for hurting women. I would challenge anyone out there to show me an example of Matthews using repeated racism to hurt a candidate he did not like. Using repeated bimbo/bitch attacks is something Matthews has saved JUST for women he does not like. And as you know it is a strategy as much as a word choice. Here Matthews twisted Bachmann's words to deliberately race bait ( just as the press did to Hillary with her mentioning of LBJ and MLK to get the full job done) and to try to twist her nuanced understanding of history to paint her as stupid. I used to look down on Reds for refusing to see nuance in issues, (and I still do now, say on abortion issues) but the Blues have shown themselves to be as horrific at exploiting lack of nuance in their attacks as the Reds ever were. This post is not a stand for Bachmann, but a stand against bigots who use sexsim, and misogyny to hurt women because they can.
Interesting, but as to your
Interesting, but as to your "no account nigger" argument, the difference is this: I have never heard a white person called a no account nigger. Ever. But, I have heard men called bimbo. Granted, sometimes they qualify it as "male" bimbo. Regardless, if I ever hear a white person called "no account nigger" (and I sure would like to as I have been called nigger plenty in my youth), I'll give your point more credence.
Fact is words are constantly changing. For instance the word "nigger" (without the "no account" addition), is now being used by some whites in the "that's my nigger" manner used in hip hop. So I don't think it is "inane" to suggest, that like nigger, the word bimbo is also mutating beyond only being a put down for women. Sure it is more often used to reference women, just like nigger is still more often used to refer to blacks, but that doesn't mean the uses of the words are not expanding.
Furthermore, I don't see bimbo as the sexist equivalent to the pejorative use of nigger. In fact I don't know what sexist term I would say is the equivalent to nigger. Maybe "cunt"? But that would be more in the United States than other countries. For instance while in Australia I discovered some Aussies use the "C" word the way some Americans use bitch and nigger. At times it is a put down, at others it is a term of inclusiveness or endearment. Not that I agree with that use, but as I said language and words are constantly mutating.
So I guess when Chris Mathews calls Michelle Bachmann a "no account cunt," then I'll say, "Wow, that's like him calling me a no account nigger!"
I'd suggest, calling Bachmann a bimbo is more like calling her a clown, a term usually reserved for... well, male bimbos.
I will offer that Matthews can be antiquated in how he frames things. However, I don't think he is intentionally sexist, any more than I thought he was intentionally racist when he gushed about how well Obama spoke during one of his campaign speeches. He thought he was giving a compliment to Obama, but it was actually a put down of black Americans, to whom Obama was the grand educated exception.
I must admit, I do like your term "pothole", but then that demeans all the real potholes that are only victims of a lack of city finances to repair them!
"Furthermore, I don't see
"Furthermore, I don't see bimbo as the sexist equivalent to the pejorative use of nigger. In fact I don't know what sexist term I would say is the equivalent to nigger. Maybe "cunt"? "
This is the problem, isn't it? MB simply can't imagine a world in which sexist slurs are the equivalent to the likes of nigger, kike, chinc, spic or fag. All of these slurs matter because all these (male) persons matter.
It's hard for me to get that angry at MB as I am simply so tired of having to explain the basics over and over again. But let me just guess that MB, who is black, cares when a black woman is treated in a racist matter but has never given thought to the sexism that black women endure. If he were to give thought to sexism, then I suppose he would care about the high rates of domestic violence against black women (35 percent higher in black communities than white communities and nearly double that of other races).
MB doesn't seem to give that much thought to the lives of women in general, whatever their race. Perhaps he can begin with this wonderful article by Femisex which states that "slut" is the word most used by rapist as they rape, followed closely by bitch and whore. And geez, that's not even the c-word!
http://www.femisex.com/content/slut-word-used-most-often-rapists-they-rape
Yes, MB, words matter for women too. And I agree in part with the commenter who said that women should stop crying out against racism. I find racism horrible and I understood racism from a young age since my family is biracial. But many, many liberal doodz stand up and speak out against racism but not so for sexism. So I personally think that the issues of race, the environment, homophobia, etc. do not need me while misogyny has long been the issue that liberal and conservative doodz deny. This is the issue that needs my blood, sweat and tears.
This is shameful and should
This is shameful and should not be tolerated. The troll who shows up on posts that complain about the obvious use of sexism to "state" that sexism is really not sexism.
Malicious boy says he is black and given that claim, what we have here is a black man who is very glad that he is no longer called nigger (outside of hip hop bs) but has no problem with the use of the B, S, or W words. What a frean' troll.
What we have here is a black male who knows that if Jerry Seinfeld's co-star Kramer uses the word nigger on stage he has to apologize with tail between his legs and if Obama is alluded to (or not) as a monkey by the New York Post, the Post has to apologize with tail between its legs, but in the meantime Malicious Boy is sitting pretty defending the sexism that is rampant in society.
Freakn' troll.
IF THERE WAS EVER AN ARGUEMENT FOR FEMINISTS TO STOP WORRING ABOUT RACISM AND FOCUS SOLELY ON SEXISM MALICIOUS BOY IS THAT ARGUEMENT.
He says that words change. What a load of bullshit. Nigger has not changed. It is still a racist term and the B, W, S words are still sexist terms. Suggesting blacks are stupid and lazy is racism. Malicious Boy gets THAT! He just refuses to get that suggesting women are bimbos or the B word is sexist.
Trolls for Sexism be gone.
Kind of expected some
Kind of expected some backlash.
No, never said that "bimbo" isn't at times used in a sexist manner, only that sometimes it is not used that way and words do evolve.
If you read my entire post, you'd also see that I said re: Mathews "that Matthews can be antiquated in how he frames things. However, I don't think he is intentionally sexist, any more than I thought he was intentionally racist when he gushed about how well Obama spoke during one of his campaign speeches." So I don't think he was purposefully being racist or sexist, but do agree he could have chose better words to get his point across.
Nigger is racist when used in a racist manner. I'm not thrilled it has taken on less incendiary values and that some blacks now use it as a friendly greeting, but the fact is whether I want to accept it or not -- it has evolved. That's all I was saying about bimbo.
And again, there is a big difference between the word nigger and bimbo. Never seen someone hung, their church bombed while they were being called a bimbo. So comparing the two words doesn't hold up in my opinion. And please don't take that as me saying my suffereing is worse or more important. Only that the words aren't of equal values. Which is why I brought up the C word which I do feel is equivalent. Perhaps even bitch is equivalent at times. No doubt women have experienced a lot of brutality while hearing either of those words. Also --
I never said that suggesting women are bimbos or the b word is not sexist, only that it is not sexist in ALL instances. Like the word bimbo, I've heard men called the b word. Is that sexist? Or reverse sexist? Sure there are misogynists who will purposefully demean just as there are racists purposefully demean. But is Mathews a true misogynist? He does have a lot of women on his show as pundits. Is that bad? Would a misogynist give them a voice on his show? I've seen him be brusque and dismissive to anyone he disagrees with. But is he purposefully misogynist? As I said of his Obama remarks, I don't consider him racist, just woefully dated. His use of "bimbo" seems about the same.
As the heightened instances of racism that have occurred with Obama's presidency show, you can't stamp out hurtful attitudes by scaring people into not expressing negative views. When this country finally is fortunate enough to elect a woman as president (hopefully not Palin or Bachmann in my view) there will be a similar renewed hateful reaction from true misogynists. My guess is that Mathews will be cheering the accomplishment, perhaps in his backhanded, foolish, "boy she sure is great for a woman" manner, like his "boy he sure is great for a black guy" comment, but he'll be cheering none-the-less, and so will I.
Last, honestly not trying to be a troll, just trying to have a thoughtful conversation. If you are not confident enough to discuss your positions without resorting to ad hominem attacks, well then I guess you're not really trying to convince anyone who doesn't already agree with your position to understand your position. To change attitudes you'll need to do more than push Mathews off tv (if you think he deserves that) you need to promote change by making those who don't understand your message, finally get and feel your message. And that tends to happen through dialogue and shared experience.
MB, "No, never said that
MB,
"No, never said that "bimbo" isn't at times used in a sexist manner, only that sometimes it is not used that way and words do evolve."
When I was a girl I heard one of my friend's dad regularly using the word "nigger". I had never heard anyone use this word before (except to reference racism) and I was appalled. My friend explained that her dad's use of the n-word was not racist because he used it toward both white and black people, anyone he thought was stupid.
I was confused by this and talked to my parents about it. They told me because of this history of the word and what it meant to black people that it was NEVER acceptable to use this word, whether it is used against someone white or black.
Now I wonder, if the majority of Americans accepted that the n-word was a word that could be applied to anyone who was stupid, how would you feel about it's continued use today? How would you feel about Rush Limbaugh calling Joe Biden a nigger? How would black kids feel about their President being called a nigger? And I do mean routinely and in the mainstream media. (Perhaps someone would be explaining to you, oh, you see... it's a word that can be applied to anyone who acts the fool, so it's okay!)
But it's not okay. Black children would feel the hatred because the n-word, by this point in time, would not have evolved into an entirely different meaning. The root meaning would still/ is still connected to the African American experience.
So it's just wrong. It's wrong to use racial or gender slurs in a hateful way against anyway.
As a woman I have tremendous experience with all these words: slut, bitch, whore, cunt and bimbo and so do all of my female friends. Damn, the stories I could tell. Call a man any of these words and it's still degrading toward women just as calling a white person a nigger (in a hateful way) is still degrading toward blacks. BTW, I personally have never heard a man called a bimbo although I take your word that this occurs.
And interesting your example of the Chris Matthews ignoramus comment about Obama. The difference is, Matthews was trying to deliver a compliment and it came out awkward and ignorant. Meanwhile, women politicians are not so lucky to receive sexism of the complimentary variety from Matthews - it's often simply pure hatred instead.
MB, According to your logic I
MB,
According to your logic I should be calling Alan Keyes a nigger and then after I do that, I should go ahead and call Glen Beck a nigger too.
But seeing as I disagree with your approach to language, I'm not going to do that.
I don't think you should be
I don't think you should be calling anyone a nigger.
You should reread what I've said.
"I don't think you should be
"I don't think you should be calling anyone a nigger."
Yes, I know. That was point. Clearly you would never approve of the use of the n-word used in a hateful way. But using the b-word in a hateful way toward a female politician by a male pundit is just fine with you.
Is there a Deathwatch out for
Is there a Deathwatch out for Matthews? If not, please post one! This creep has it out for woman of both political parties
Hi there Addison. Yes, there
Hi there Addison. Yes, there is a FemiSex Deathwatch out on Mattews http://www.femisex.com/content/olbermann-matthews-deathwatch
Clearly this was a hastily
Clearly this was a hastily written post but the message is clear. If Katie Couric really cared about women's rights she'd feature the Crooks and Liars Bachmann dispicable artwork along with Mother Jones and Salon's declothing of female politicians as a faeture on Nightly News. Diane Sawyer could win women to ABC with this story and do a good thing.
"We women are still told that
"We women are still told that we MUST be Sugar, or Lorelei ... "
Mostly to give men the requisite ammunition that they can use to destroy us for being mere bimbos later on.
Post new comment