FemiStats—Obesity and Health Care Costs

fat skinny

Obesity Medical Costs Average 42% more than normal weight persons.

The most recent CDC review found that 34 percent of adults aged 20 and over are obese. Rates of
overweight and obesity remain high in children and adolescents aged 2 through 19 years of age,
with 31.9 percent at or above the 85th percentile of the 2000 BMI-for-age growth charts, according
to the Journal of American Medicine.
The proportion of all annual medical costs that are due to obesity increased from
6.5 percent in 1998 to 9.1 percent in 2006, totaling $147 billion, according to
a new CDC study. This total includes payment by Medicare, Medicaid, and private
insurers, and includes prescription drug spending.
Overall, persons who are obese spent $1,429 (42 percent) more for medical care
in 2006 than did normal weight people. These estimates were compiled using
national data that compare medical expenses for normal weight and obese persons.
Obese individuals in the United States are at
greater risk for chronic disease — type 2 diabetes, cardiovascular disease, hypertension,
stroke, even some forms of cancer — at an annual cost of $117 billion. Not included in
this estimate are indirect costs of obesity — income lost from decreased productivity,
restricted activity, absenteeism and bed days.

Comments

Lets all watch our weight and

Lets all watch our weight and regardless what health plan comes along we will be better off.

Lets all watch our weight and

Lets all watch our weight and hope to live longer.

So would your plan to keep

So would your plan to keep obese people from driving up your health care costs be to send obese people to government sponsored training programs to force them to lose weight or put a surtax on their health insurance? How about people who ride motorcycles? Or parents who knowingly give birth to a child who is going to have a condition that requires above average medical care? Do we make every pregnant woman undergo amniocentesis and if her expected child has birth defects, give her the option of having a paid for abortion or assuming the child's medical expenses herself if she gives birth? That would certainly save a lot of money. An abortion is far cheaper than paying the medical costs for a physically or medically challenged child. Obese people are the current scapegoats in our society. Get everybody thin, and we will chose something else to scapegoat. Be careful because what we chose may be something that you are. For the record, my family's genes have made it easy for me to be "normal weight". But I lost both my thin parents to smoking-induced lung cancer. Their medical bills were high, and both were on Medicare. I wonder if my mom paid enough in cigarette taxes to cover both her and my dad's medical bills since she was the only one who smoked.

Oh Miss Peach, no, we are not

Oh Miss Peach, no, we are not suggesting charging obese patients more to use the system. That is far and away NOT what we are saying. Here we just give the statistics and numbers.
Obesity costs more, sure, but that is not to lay blame. Genetics are a factor in obesity just as genetics factor in addictions be they cigarettes or risky behaviors. Bipolar disorder is organic but also comes with higher health care costs.

This is why we must be very very careful as we draft reform. Obesity has behavioral divers to be sure. But spending a boat load of bucks on prevention may not be reasonable. People already know that overeating and lack of exercise is bad for them. And penalizing obese people is NO answer. Please don't take the presentment of stats as policy. Having information is never a bad thing. What one does with it is often the trouble.

Which is why it's ridiculous

Which is why it's ridiculous to pretend that we can get our healthcare costs down to those of single payer countries, because they do not have the obesity rates that we do in this country.

smart observation Annie!

smart observation Annie! each country has unique challenges and unique populations and each country will need unique answers, based not only one what our population currently looks like but what it will look like in the future.
e.g.,
When social security was devised the ratio of recipients to those paying into the system was something like 13 people paying into the system for every elderly person collecting. Of course now that ratio has come unhinged and social security is teetering.

Obama is intent on putting into play something that he has no idea how to pay for. If American is utterly bankrupt it can't be a force for good to anyone, least itself. We need to be very careful before we move into a system that will in the long term be unsustainable.

Don't forget that obese are

Don't forget that obese are more vulnerable to swine flu

hi Glenda and thanks for the

hi Glenda and thanks for the reminder. we wrote about the link btw obesity and swine flu a short while ago.
here's the linK

http://femisex.com/content/femilab-swine-flu-shows-more-muscle-obese-may...

I like the diversity of

I like the diversity of offerings on this site. Slate has something up today that oddly asserts that obesity does not cost more because obese people die sooner. they offer no proof and their theme flies in the face of the fact that to keep an obese person on dialysis for years is less cost effective than a person of normal weight who lives to be 90.

I like the Lab and Stats part of this place.

Post new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <a> <em> <strong> <cite> <code> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd> <blockquote>
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.

More information about formatting options