George Will is an after-born government over-reacher into my free willMonday, September 12, 2011 at 5:21 pm — admin
Heavy sigh. In the New York Post a week or so ago, George Will wrote a piece on "the dishonest foes of school choice." Will said this: "...conservatives are pro-choice about most things--owning guns, driving SUVs, using incandescent light bulbs, etc.--other than killing pre-born babies." Ahhhha, bawwwa, what a pack of horseshit. Selling forced procreation as something good is bullshit. George Will is the trouble with the Old School Right: they just can't understand women as more than objects--the same as the Current School of Lefties. George Will must step aside and let in fresh female voice in the RED party to turn it back to its good roots of fiscal sanity and social liberty. People who want to marry people of the same sex, so be it. Fine. But...That is so much less an issue than ownership over one's own body, but it is actually surging to acceptance into the Red paryt before the concept of self ownership over one's internal organs! I'd rather be denied a state sanctioned marriage certificate than forced to bring a child into the world I did not wish to bear. That is the stuff of personal slavery. Period. Why the odd anti-choice pro government forced procreation stand in Old School Reds? For the same reason current Blue men don't care about abortion rights, not really. They want to have control to some degree over the fate of their gene pool. And most importantly, make women beg for the right to be free creatures. Make a young girl beg, make a woman with a Down Syndrome fetus beg, make them beg for control over their own bodies. Make them objects. Here is something odd going in the state of Miss. Thanks to the CRR for the heads up on this. Enough is enough. Stop telling women they are objects for force your will upon. Let the Republican party end the government intrusion tack and turn the GOP boat around to fiscal matters. |
|
Comments
Re your comment "Embryo's and
Re your comment "Embryo's and fetuses are not separate from the women in whom they reside":
This is just false. We can have an argument about whether it is ok to kill pre-born babies. There is all sorts of killing that is deemed legitimate. But it is just contra-factual to deny that a genetically distinct "fetus" is not a distinct human life.
Dear HarryKan, you must learn
Dear HarryKan, you must learn the words you speak. Contra-factual would mean that women are not needed to bring a FETUS to term. I will happily supply you with a whole bunch of IVF embryos and you just see if you can get them to do anything but shrivel without a uterus.
Women OWN their bodies. We have no tolerance for those who would force women into government reproductive mandated slavery.
You have pre born urine in your body as we speak and it would be contra factual to suggest it does not require you body to exist.
You should know that we as a site are fully against government intrusion into your piss and you should stay the hell out of women's bodies. Government CAN NOT force women to procreate. Period. End of story. Try to take an embryo or fetus home with you and you will see that without a woman's body it does NOT NOT NOT exist. Period. get over it and stop trying to Taliban women. It is so freakn boring.
We accept all comment here but I think you have a mindset more Taliban Radical Muslim than Fiscal Responsible.
Less government is really good especially when they want a look inside your body.
Great great title! Says it
Great great title! Says it all.
Post new comment