Hanna and the Hijab

variations on a theme

An Iranian woman called Hanna cried out for freedom this week. According to the NYTimes she posted this on the website of an Iranian opposition candidate:
“I AM ALIVE BUT MY SISTER WAS KILLED. SHE WANTED THE WIND TO BLOW INTO HER HAIR, SHE WANTED TO BE FREE; SHE WANTED TO HOLD HER HEAD HIGH UP AND SAY: I AM IRANIAN. MY SISTER DIED BECAUSE THERE IS NO LIFE LEFT; MY SISTER DIED BEASUE THERE IS NO END TO THE TYRANNY.”

Make no mistake, it was no mistake that Hanna wrote she wanted the wind to blow into her hair. Make no mistake she wrote about the death of a woman, not the deaths of the men who have died this past week.

In his Celebrity World Tour, Barack Obama reached out to Muslim men by tossing them the bone of women’s freedom. It was shameful and EXACTLY Obama—the sly use of misogyny and sexism and female repression to up his credibility with males (and those percentage of women who prefer male authority as the world order, even though they would never admit this, even to themselves. See Ann Coulter and Jessica Valenti as perfect examples of women who prefer Daddy Power! )

Here are those shameful words of Mr. Obama:
"I reject the view of some in the West that a woman who chooses to cover her hair is somehow less equal." ~ Obama in Cairo

Never mind that Obama
banned the hijab from his election podium! What a hypocrite!

Here is what one women activist Ms. Habchi has to say to Obama:

“The hijab flies the flag for extremism”
FRANCE - Silhem Habchi has been president of the women's rights movement Ni putes ni soumises (Neither whores nor submissive) since 2007.
I'm very disappointed. Obama, the first president to represent diversity, is supposed to symbolise peace-making. And yet, he forgot one half of humanity. I'm furious. It's like he tried to make a compromise with the Arab world with women paying the price. Trying to get closer to the Muslim world in turning a blind eye to women's rights, to democratic values and to the right of emancipation, is to exploit women. He can't truly want to fight against religious extremism and give in over the hijab issue at the same time. The hijab flies the flag for extremism."

Obama has gone on to say:
"It is important for Western countries to avoid impeding Muslim citizens from practicing religion as they see fit -- for instance, by dictating what clothes a Muslim woman should wear. We can't disguise hostility towards any religion behind the pretence of liberalism." ~Obama in France.

Repression, Of course, was and is what Obama was really selling to Muslim men:
“It is important for Western countries to avoid impeding Muslim Men from repressing women as they see fit.”
That is EXACTLY what Obama was saying.

Sure get those girls in school, but feel FREE to dictate every other aspect of their daily lives including forcing women to wear what males dictate, see and marry whom males dictate, circulate in society as males dictate, gain power as males dictate, have child custody as males dictate, exercise control over their bodies as males dictate,.. etc. etc.

Now hear this:
As long as Muslim society has males demanding how females must dress there is no freedom for women, no "choice" to wear the burqa or have “the wind to blow into her hair.”

But the one sure thing Mr. Obama has learned from the U.S. elections: Males in power love it when powerful males tell them it is OK to accept double standards of freedom and respect and power for women and girls.
American women have their own hijab: it is the word bitch and slut and whore. Powerful males insist on using it (see NYTimes calling Hillary a bitch or CNN or MSNBC or Air American, or etc., etc.) and there are plenty of silly women who see the word bitch and slut and whore as a choice word, the way the hijab is choice.

Such women are are actively setting us backwards…all in the hopes of acceptance into the boyz club. Admittance is simple, such women have learned: just support men for top power spots, accept sexism and double standards applied to women they don’t happen to like, and say that feminist work is NOT about gaining equality for women, but is…well, it is whatever…you know, like when you fingerpaint mushrooms and hang the picture on your wall…that is feminism if a woman says so!

Women have been primed for centuries to accept sexism and misogyny and 2nd class status in society. And it will always be the FEW brave women who push to move women forward. It is much easier to go with the flow; to not make waves. To not call for “the Wind to blow into her hair.”
Neda was the stimulus for brave Hanna to find her voice. Obama is far too cowardly to take up Hanna’s calls for freedom. The world will never hear Mr. Obama say that until no laws or cultural requirements force women to cover themselves as men dictate, they no woman can truly be FREE to wear the hijab.

The Burqa is just too bizarre to even entertain…it is like women having men lead them around by dog collars…only freaks (see Feministe and Feminsting and Obama) would support “choice" of this behavior in public. Yes here is my daughter presented for school in a dog collar and leash: see to it she keeps this on and don’t expect the other kids to value her less because she “chooses” this get up! Yak!)

Instead, Obama will continue to tell Muslim Men that HE will never ask them to truly free women. Obama himself finds that idea mind-shatteringly scary.

link to nytimes Hanna quote:
http://www.nytimes.com/2009/06/23/world/middleeast/23neda.html?_r=1&scp=2&sq=a%20young%20woman's%20fate%20resonates&st=cse

Comments

Well well, look what has

Well well, look what has popped up on Feministing Community:

this:
http://community.feministing.com/2009/06/what-about-the-muslim-women-wh....

and excerpt:

I am a Muslim woman and I do not wear the burqa or the headscarf. The constant reference in liberal media to those women who choose to wear it has made it increasingly difficult for the countless Muslim women, such as myself, to express our discomfort with it. This is because any outright criticism of the garment comes across as an intolerant attack on the religion of Islam as well as the Muslim women wearing it.
AND:
In any discussion of the ban, however, an important consideration must be the impact of the ban on all women in French society, including the Muslim women who want to resist the veil.

Read the Whole. Who by now is not sick and tired of Boyz Club "feminists" failing to see how important the whole is, how absolute is our internalization of sexism in the cultures we live in, and how important it is to change our culture in overt ways so that the physical and cognitive accoutrementsof sexism disappear. And how important is is to have a generation grow up with alpha females in traditional male roles and represented in numbers equal to those that exist in the population. 51%.

This explains

This explains everything:

http://apostate.wordpress.com/2009/06/24/french-ban-on-the-burka/

Another blog you must subscribe to.

Likewise, Sarkozy's

Likewise, Sarkozy's prospective burqa ban has significant feminist support, including the backing of the feminist group Ni Putes Ni Soumises, or Neither Whores Nor Doormats, which has its roots in France's Muslim ghettos. It's worth taking the position of Ni Putes Ni Soumises seriously, since the struggle against Islamic fundamentalism has been, for them, a matter of life and death. Like the Somali-Dutch feminist Ayaan Hirsi Ali, their activism serves as a crucial corrective to multicultural pieties.

Ultimately, though, there's no evidence that most burqa-clad French women regard themselves as oppressed.

Goldberg and Valenti should wear burkas everywhere they go and find "evidence" of oppression.

Michelle Goldberg should wear

Michelle Goldberg should wear a burka everywhere she goes and she if she feels oppressed. I wouldn't want a daughter to see women wearing burkas every day. It sets a poor example and it's not so much the fault of Muslim women but the Muslim community. Sarkozy misappropriated feminism for his nationalistic xenophobia but I'm glad burkas are banned in France on its face.

Hi folks, Donna Darko tells

Hi folks, Donna Darko tells us Missy Goldberg has posted against the Burqa Ban on the American Prospect. (see Donna's comment under
Burqa Ban. )

here is exceprt from Missy Goldberg:

Ultimately, though, there's no evidence that most burqa-clad French women regard themselves as oppressed. "There are women who wear burqas who are not being forced by anyone, who think that form of modesty is appropriate for who they want to be in the world," says Scott. "It's hard to distinguish between them and those who are being forced." And so in the end, a ban putatively passed to further women's rights could instead impinge on their freedom, and take from them something they value. Even worse, it could lead to those in the most fundamentalist of households being trapped inside their homes altogether. It would be cruel to limit these women's options in the name of liberation, even if their clothes are a rebuke to the secularism that the French rightly hold sacred.

And FemiSex reply: Hi Donna-- Yes Goldberg is a fool. House negreos often did not see themselves as oppressed either. woppe to do!
This is just more of male-owned "liberal" media giving voice to those select women who will work against women's rights in this society and others.

These women who are willing to hurt women for the sake of their careers is sad!
Of course Missy Goldberg is in love with Obama and like his other female minions in the media will do what they must to put positive spin on Obama's stupid anti-female words.
sigh!

Yes, many house negreos did not want liberation, and did not see themselves as oppressed. And for some, life did become much harder under freedom, but that is the price to be paid for the freedom of their children.
Female genital mutilation is oten done by women who do not find the practice repressing. But that is no reason to not ban it.

Failure of some to whan liberation for themselves in not an occasion to repress the fight for freedom.
snore.
There are plenty of women who don't want laws that allow choice but that is no reason to deny freedom to women.
So not seeing oneself as repressed is no arguement for not ending repression!
Banning a garment is like banning the confederate flag, yeah some are gonna cry, but too friggn' bad.
And trust me, yet again I will say it: women will not be locked inside for long; men with 3 or 4 wives can't do all that shopping and playground duty!
Added bonus, my kids won't have to see women shackled in public and grow to tolerate intolerance!

Michele Goldberg: babes for Obama, babes for burqas. babes for sexism.

Ha ha, I like thinking of

Ha ha, I like thinking of Jessica Valenti and Ann Coulter in the same camp. Perhaps they can give female empowerment workshops together.

Yeeeees! I want a Learning

Yeeeees! I want a Learning Annex class with Ann and Jessica. you r funny!
They can give out phallic table favors and lecture on how not to be a Femi Nazi: always support the male candidates!

Post new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <a> <em> <strong> <cite> <code> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd> <blockquote>
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.

More information about formatting options