Lynn Rosenthal WH advisor on Violence Against Women. Biden, NOT Obama, announces the position.

let's stress prevention, not post-abuse treatment

Washington, D.C. – The National Network to End Domestic Violence (NNEDV) today applauded President Barack Obama and Vice President Joe Biden for naming Lynn Rosenthal as White House Advisor on Violence Against Women {VAW}/ A champion in the movement against domestic and sexual violence for three decades, Rosenthal led NNEDV from 2000 to 2006

Prior to her service at NNEDV, Rosenthal directed the Florida Coalition Against Domestic Violence. There, she developed groundbreaking service models for rural and legal services. She also created the state’s first comprehensive plan to help survivors find housing. Rosenthal most recently served as the executive director of the New Mexico Coalition Against Domestic Violence.

She played a major advocacy role in the reauthorization of the Violence Against Women Act in 2000 and 2005 and has assisted states and local communities with its implementation.

Rosenthal has also worked closely with corporate partners to bring millions of dollars to local communities to respond to domestic violence. She has also partnered with The Allstate Foundation to develop a national initiative to promote economic empowerment for survivors of violence.

By choosing Lynn, the administration is choosing to make a real difference in the lives of domestic violence and sexual assault survivors.”

The above is from NNEDV press release.

Joe Biden the VICE pres. announced this pick and position--a signal by the Obama that this is not a President-worthy subject.
How easy would it have been for Obama and his LOVE of the camera to make this announcement himself and bring on the press attention it deserves! Bet you've not even heard bout this on any major news outlet!
Still....
We at FemiSex are big-time clapping about the appointment, but would also LOVE to hear that Rosenthal will shift focus from helping victims overcome DV to prevention. Her past work has focused heavily on victim aid. I worry her appointment signals that the WH want to stay the course--treat the disease, not prevent it.
We need a forward-looking program that hits at the underlying causes of this Violence Against Women disease, rather than simply treating victims.
When 50% of teens think that Rhinna had it coming, there has never been a better time to focus forward.

When Chris Brown can escape jail time for viciously beating a women, there is considerable work to be done.
Hit a woman, go to jail; rape a woman go to jail.

Currently only 6% of rapists spend even a single day in jail! WE HAVE WORK to do in convincing the public that violence against women is not a plea bargin offense that earns you probation and community service...same as you'd likely get for kicking your dog. (FemiSex woud like to see felony changes become standard for animal cruelty as well, but that's another blog post!)

Ending VAW would entail a national campaign against sexism and misogyny, right down to public service campaign of zero tolerance of media and comedian sexism and misogyny! When woman and girls are viewed as 2nd class citizens—little more than sluts and bitches on prime time TV and in national media publications and outlets, or as Salon.com says: “fuckable Stepford wives,”-- violence against females will continue at abhorrent rates. The latest DOJ stats show DV against women has climbed 42% in the period between 2005 and 2007. Rape is up 25%.

The media has FAILED to cover this. The White House, in announcing this appointment did not stress the soaring rates of violence happening now, against females (DV against males by intimate partners—male and female—went down during this same time period) or get at the root cause of such violence. The WH is mum on the pervasive sexism of our culture that encourages society to view women as less than--objects to be punished when they cause distress to the patriarchal status quo, or if dude is just in a bad mood.

And while this is a new position created by the WH, it IS in keeping with the WH theme of helping only those women who are physical or economic victims of violence. The WH has no intention of stopping the more “civilized” sexism aimed at women who are gaining power. Lynn would be very brave to tackle the root causes of VAW in a hard-hitting way, to move away from providing resources and move towards changing public attitudes about women in society. I worry such bravery would not be rewarded by Barack and Joe. Sexism put Barack where he is and he may need it again in 2012 if any women tries for the crown. Snowe or Collins are you listening?

Of course that brings us to a main difference in 4th WAVE Feminism—4th wavers want to combat the roots of sexism, prevent the disease—not only putting an end to DV and Rape, but also ending verbal violence against Type A women and cultural debasement of women as a whole; we want to prevent the diease; 3rd wavers are stuck on treating the victims, not on moving society towards ZERO Tolerance of SEXISM!
(Unlike obesity and the eat right and exercise mantras we all know, there has been no national campaign to get us to respect women as equal to men!)
3rd Wavers still want a Daddy in the White House and tolerate sexism quite nicely when used against THAT woman.

So we Wish Lynn Rosenthal well!!!!, and we hope she will 4th WAVE IT! HiT Hard at the cultural roots of sexism and agitate for zero tolerance to sexism in media. This is a very very very important cause of VAW. Lynn has the opportunity to make a few waves. We are sending her a surfboard and a fitted girl wetsuit! Got get em, Lynn!
I want my daughter to never be hit or raped more than I want her to get economic assistance or therapy after the fact!
We are what our culture accepts.

Comments

AN OPEN LETTER TO LYNN

AN OPEN LETTER TO LYNN ROSENTHAL,
NEW WHITE HOUSE ADVISOR ON VIOLENCE AGAINST WOMEN
On June 26, 2009, Vice President Biden named Lynn Rosenthal as White House Advisor on Violence Against Women (VAW). Rosenthal has championed the movement against domestic and sexual violence for three decades, leading the National Network to End Domestic Violence (NNEDV) from 2000 to 2006. Most recently, she served as executive director of the New Mexico Coalition Against Domestic Violence. Previously, she played a major advocacy role in reauthorizing the Violence Against Women Act and assisted states and communities with its implementation. For the Florida Coalition Against Domestic Violence, she developed service models and created the state’s first comprehensive plan to help survivors find housing. She has also worked with corporate partners to promote economic empowerment for survivors and to bring millions of dollars in aid to communities in responding to domestic violence.
Ms. Lynn Rosenthal
White House Advisor on Violence Against Women

Dear Ms. Rosenthal,
As you are aware, domestic violence is a matter of life and death for millions of women. There simply is no excuse for domestic violence resources to fail to assist victims in need—yet each month, it is estimated that thousands of abused women are turned away from state and federally funded domestic violence coalitions and shelters each month. These victims have no recourse when this happens, and no place to report their experiences or grievances.

The cold, hard reality is that these victims are falling through the cracks—ignored by the very organizations whose mission it is to assist them. Because of this failure, a growing number of victims are reaching out to Survivors In Action (SIA), a non-profit national advocacy group that provides individual assistance to victims of domestic abuse.

Ms. Rosenthal, given your extraordinary qualifications and clear commitment to preventing domestic violence, SIA is encouraged by your appointment as White House Advisor. Your appointment signals recognition at the highest levels of government that now is the time for real change and domestic violence resource reform. Without such reform, more victims will be subject to what advocates and victims now refer to as "The DV Run Around," and more will die.

We believe the DV Run Around occurs in large part because there is so little oversight of how funds are used by the thousands of state and federally funded domestic violence organizations and no assessment of whether these organizations are meeting victims’ needs. Accordingly, SIA is leading a two-pronged movement for national domestic violence resource reform:

• First, we are advocating that the government audit the federal grants and other funds that domestic violence organizations receive to determine how these funds are being used and to ensure accountability.
• Second, we are advocating the creation of a Federal Domestic Violence Oversight Committee to oversee state and federally funded domestic violence organizations and provide victims a place to document their experiences and file complaints.

As evidence of increasing public recognition of the urgent need for measures like these, we have obtained more than 1,000 signatures on our petition for Domestic Violence Resource Reform in just a matter of weeks.

As stated by Family Violence Prevention Fund President Esta Soler, “At a time when domestic, dating and sexual violence are pervasive problems that touch every community, and on average three women are murdered each day by their husbands or boyfriends, we need renewed attention to this issue and increased resources for victims and prevention measures.”

Ms. Rosenthal, I can’t express this any more clearly than Ms. Soler has in her statement above. The victims of domestic violence desperately need—and SIA respectfully requests—your support for the above measures. Please stand up for these reforms now.

Thank you so much for your attention and concern.

Sincerely,

Alexis A. Moore
President
Survivors In Action
"No Victim Left Behind"

What is Survivors In Action?
Survivors In Action (SIA) is a non-profit national advocacy group that supports victims and the families of victims of any crime, including domestic violence, identity theft, elder abuse, cyber-stalking, stalking, child abuse, rape, and sexual assault, Other national organizations typically help victims at specific points in their abusive experience cycle—such as when they first report the abuse or in writing parole opposition letters—leaving “gaps” in needed services. SIA is the only organization that fills the gaps, providing support through all stages of the journey from victim to survivor, with no time limitations, cut-off dates, or conditions. Our mission is to ensure that no victim anywhere in the nation is left behind.

Lynn Rosenthah is a good

Lynn Rosenthah is a good choice but as you said lets work on the prevention.

"Joe Biden the VICE pres.

"Joe Biden the VICE pres. announced this pick and position--a signal by the Obama that this is not a President-worthy subject"

Well, this is what many young feminists voted for.

Denver: "... and do nothing to prevent men from hitting in the first place."

What! Obama ask a man to change? It's preposterous!
He needs the misogynistic support to keep his poll numbers up.

The new york times recently

The new york times recently wrote about a 25 year old black women with four kids. She wanted to leave her abusive partner but didn't have money or education. So she turned her kids over to a program that will raise the kids while she gets herself together.
Watch for an increase of this sort of funding from Obama administration.
Look, I hate slobs who hit women, but why is it so hard to ask why this women produced 4 kids with no way to support and an abusive partner.

I think this site is brave to call it-- Obama will use this at a way to spend a lot of money on low income women and do nothing to prevent men from hitting in the first place.

Obama knows only how to spend money for short term fixes, he has no clue how to really solve problems.
Michelle Obama could really get the message out here.: Wait until you have an education to have a child, then at least you will have resources to leave the lout who hits. This is one very large problem for abused women--no resources to leave. Don't look to Obama for more than spending bucks. And lol, he will never allow a campaign to end cultural sexism. He feeds on this!

I don't see him increasing

I don't see him increasing welfare at all. Kids can't stay at shelters either. This program's head is in the right place.

Don't get me wrong, I like

Don't get me wrong, I like helping out kids and you're right shelters are crap for kids.
However, I feel that women need to stop having children who stand very little chance in this world. Waiting to have kids until you can provide for them is a hallmark that the kid will be a success in life.

Obama is spending like a drunken sailor, but i see none of it going towards prevention of this situation. As a matter of fact, he has dis-abled a lot of the Clinton welfare reform. And that is welfare promotion in many ways.
At what point do we ask for personal responsibility? I think of myself as purple, not donkey or elephant.
I will fight for women to have all the free controceptives they need, fight for them to be able to secure student loans that have different repayment schedules for women--that is, deferrent while pregnant and for 4 or 6 months post pregnancy, etc. etc. But I am facing the fact that too many women don't make responsible choices about their education and kids.
70 percent of black children are born outside of marriage. No one tells us how many of those are high-school drop outs, or non-college educated, but my guess is that it is rigth up there at the 70% mark. These are not women who get a degree start a job and then make a grown up decision to have children without a husband, these are very young children having children with no thought to the future. How far do my sympathies extend for a woman who has four kids and no way to support them? How much do we want society to accept this as OK? And, I can see one kid coming into an abusive relationship, but 4? This is just talking things, and my sympathies, too far frankly.
Look
I want gays to marry and have kids, I want single women with careers to have kids, I want social programs that assist kids to get into college, but I am starting to draw the line at supporting bad decisions. It seems very reasonable to me.
If I am expected to do the right thing, then I expect others to at least give it a shot. This is not the 50s, young women of color have many options now. I came out of poverty and decided to change my life. I tended bar all through college, ended up with student loans, waited to pay those off as I worked long hours building a career. Sure I'd have liked to have had it easier, maybe had a couple more kids, but I played the hand I was dealt, smartly.

Clinton replacing AFDC with

Clinton replacing AFDC with TANF was an unmitigated disaster. If Nancy Deparle who is married to Jason Deparle who wrote American Dreams has her way, it will be a great thing.

American Dreams humanizes the

American Dreams humanizes the people behind the poverty, sure.
It is also a book in which I find a very strong arguement against having kids until you are ready for them.
And for some, that moment may never occur--say for those who are hopelessly haunted by their drug addiction.
(Deparle never says this, but the reality of this reality is lurking in each story.)

I really agree that the only way to end the chain of poverty is be pro-active in helping women to not have children they can not provide for, emotionally or financially. I believe children are too important to bring into the world with all odds stacked against them.

I won't jump into the water until I've learned to swim. It just makes sense. When good swimmers (educated moms) get caught in a rip tide, then a short period of government help (5 years) is reasonable. But lifetime of help? This just keeps them drowning, as I see things. That is why I am a fan of the welfare reform that happened under Clinton, and the results were pretty spectacular.
TANF reduced welfare rolls by massive amounts. In a good economy it was the exactly the right thing to do. In a bad economy I can see extending benefits on temporary basis, but that is not what Obama has done. He has gotten rid of the caps forever. That is just going backwards towards lifetime and generational dependency.

And for the women who got into trouble with health care cost for those kids, once they got off welfare rolls and went to work, we now have government paid insurance for any kids whose parents make $60,000 a year of less. (I think that is the right number, it may even be higher in some areas.)

It took women off welfare

It took women off welfare rolls and replaced it with nothing. As a result, many more women and children are homeless.

I think you have a point. It

I think you have a point. It is true, we need more subsidized housing in big cities.
There is actually an oversupply of such housing in middle America, but in the coastal cities, this would be a big help. Of course, women could relocate to middle America, but that is often something they are unwilling to do.
It may seem cold-hearted to suggest, but I made this difficult decision at one point.
I had to leave my family circle and move to Kansas for a job. I did not like it but I did it because I had no choice. I finally worked my way back to civilization (Boston) now, thankfully. Sorry Kansas, you are not that bad. And I will say they do have plentiful housing--very cheap and lots of public subs for the needy. In fact, much of sub'd housing in that state is not utilized. Everyone wants to live on the Coasts.

I like this site becasue you

I like this site becasue you are not as easily satisfied. You are like men, you don't just say thank you, you say, this would be better.

It reminds me of the moment when the starving boy in Dicken's novel has the audacity to say : Sir, May I please have some more?

keep this up!
women are so easily mollifed with false hopes and broken promises.
Yes, Obama shoud have made this announcement himself.

Post new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <a> <em> <strong> <cite> <code> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd> <blockquote>
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.

More information about formatting options