Ok, so you say, MSM is not anti-woman, just anti-Republican woman. Then how does one explain the piece in the New Yorker by anti-woman (pro-Obama) writer Connie Bruck that paints Republican Carly Fiorina as a nasty B woman who is using her devil tactics against angelic Republican Tom Campbell? It is hard to find a better example of sexist writing than this article--an article that women's studies classes should use to showcase liberal sexism in every class room in the country! To wit: ....
When Fiorina points out Campbell's negatives she is "attacking and mocking" him. When Campbell puts out a "book" of negative attacks on Fiorina he is "making assessments" about her. This is too bizarre for words folks but that is the state of play at the New Yorker these days: woe be the women who seek power.

Fiorina is "mocking Campbell as a perennial office seeker" ..yes the woman MOCKS for telling the truth about the reality of Campbell's status as a career politician. But....the sexist writer Bruck cherry picks a quote to defend the Red dude saying "Tom Campbell really understands how government works" and then Bruck herself defends his position saying "being both an expert in government and a believer in limiting it is no way inconsistent..."

The sexist Bruck says Carly Fiorina "looking steely and battle-ready..." blah blah blah...resorting to the craven and every so tired and prosaic Bi%ch or bimbo routine that liberal media uses to slam women. Steely and battle ready is the woman but "Campbell is a rarity in political life: someone whoo insists, politely, on staying true to his own beliefs."

Now kids, this is not a quote from a sympathetic friend, no this is ahhhhmmm...the so-called journalist's (Connie Bruck) own words. Yes, over and over we are told by this bigoted writer and the friends of Campbell that he is a "nice guy." And we are told repeatedly in straight talk and innuendo that Carly is the big bad wicked B woman who wants female power and MUST be stopped. She, like Hillary, is being mean to the dude who should have the top spot.

Here are more outrageous sexists attacks on Fiorina: "she concentrated her attacks on Boxer..." but when Campbell took the lead...
"...she turned her attention ON him."

Note the attack dog wording. Rather than write that Fiorina turned her attention TO him, the writer conjures attack dog visions in readers heads, using ON him.
Bruck makes it very easy to picture the junk yard dog going after the poor little boy wandering helplessly by and stuck down by her fangs.

Fiorina was "widely ridiculed" says writer Bruck.
Then the sexism continues as Bruck never lets up saying "Other attacks on his record have been more personal." hmmmmm....What were these personal attacks?? Well they, according to Campbell were "whispering attacks" saying that he was soft on terror.
now...
There is no link to Fiorina on these "whispering attacks' but that's not a problem for the sexist Bruck. She plants the seed of Fiorina as evil. And can anyone please tell Bruck campaigns are adversarial. That's the nature of the game...just remember Obama's whispering attacks on Hillary as a racist and as a women who would let her emotions rule the country rather than his sound reason. And what the hell is personal about being soft on terror? Hello...national and foreign policy is not a personal attack! Having your wife say that because Hillary's husband cheated she is UNFIT to be potus....THAT is a personal attack.

Now to defend Campbell for the truth of his being a career politician at a time when that is really really bad (Obama used the same tactic towards Hillary, remember..., but hey he's a cool black due and she is the wicked woman who wanted power so THAT was OK with these freaky liberal women )and to upend Fiorina as a newbie to the running for office (a big plus these days), Bruck writes : "Fiorina, like a practiced politician..."

Now the entire piece is the practiced art of sublimal sexism: punish a woman for playing politics. Why? Well because that is the male domain. And trust me, Campbell is hardball far more so than Fiorina, BUT here is how the bigot and sexist Bruck protects Campbell for attacking Fiorina:

"The Campbell campaign has issued it own ASSESSMENT of Fiorina's management of H-P. The Book on Carly is an online dossier on Fiorina compiled from books and magazines....in the past month, a new 'chapter' has been sent by e-mail every few days {during the campaign} The book includes a video prologue, which does not make her sound {like a decent person}."

Campbell's Book on Carly contains dozens of vicious slams on Fiorina, but remember, according to sexist writer Bruck, these are not attacks by Campbell but ASSESSMENTS."
Time out to cough out the hairball that is Connie Bruck!

Bruck takes the time to list every nasty slam to Fiorina that Campbell came up with but NEVER admits that he is acting like a politician going negative and doing Attack ads. No, the entire article is paen to Mr. Nice Guy getting beat up by the big bad Bi%Ch.

Now, as much as I hate to recommend reading the Bruck story, it is a must!
The entire piece is a How To use sexism to smear the women for doing what women ought not do: challenge males, act alpha and want power. Women are not allowed to "make assessments" that are negative for if they do they must be portrayed as just shy of Beelzebub in all his horned evil glory.
FemiSex is sick to death of the liberal women's sexism.
Fuck liberal women and the damage they are doing to ALL women with their bizarre and pathological terror they have of powerful women.

But what is REALLY sad is the uttter lack of talent displayed by Bruck in her demented rush to shit all over women who want the right to play the same hardball politics as men. This article is worthy of a teenager in love defending her boyfriend. Mostly it is just sad, overt sexism.

Ok, kids..the New Yorker has blocked me (and all readers) from a quick copy and paste of examples of sexism from their story, sorry...Their shame must be massive!
But I've done my best to capture with quotes that clearly show the sexism that permeates this high-school like smear job.
But readers, we have the joy of knowing Fiorina KICKED Campbell's media-protected ass this June! Can the New Yorker BE any more out of touch? That would be hard, very hard.