Why do almost 80% of Americans say Obama is not on the up and up about what ObamaCare will cost?

Well, consider this: While Obama is forcing the CBO to score his health care bill based on his assurance that Medicare costs will be slashed—indeed almost all of Obama’s claims that this bill is (LMAO) “deficit neutral” are based on cutting billions from Medicare--take a look at Democrat Nita M. Lowey’s latest mailer to her constituents. In that letter, Lowey says we MUST pass health care realignment. What must health care reform contain to be considered worthy by Lowey? You guess it:

“Improved benefits for seniors in traditional Medicare….”

Obama has treated the citizens of this country as little more than fools, fools ready and willing to be hoodwinked and duped by his dubious promise to do what has NEVER been done: cut Medicare spending. Lowey is giving her liberal constituents (the mailer went out to democratic donors) the ol’ wink and a nod: assuring them that she and Barack have no intention of cutting benefits and costs in Medicare.
But…who you gonna believe? Its either cuts or no cuts. What you wanna bet the only thing that gets the ax is the last remaining cents of your disposable income. Heck who needs a vacation when we can send all our money to D.C. postmarked ObamaCaid. And enjoy the wait lists to see your MD with the addition of millions to the rolls without a single provision on how to grow MDs at the rate we will need to avoid rationed appointments.
(Watch for more on MD shortages tomorrow.)

now...About Obama's plan to cut payments to hospitals and MDs for Medicare and Medicaid patients:

From the NYTimes: Prescriptions: Protests over Medicare Plan—Dec. 11th, 2009:

“Hospitals, doctors and other heath care providers often complain that Medicare payments are insufficient to cover their expenses. They would rather have patients be covered by private insurance.”

The Times writes this as though the hospitals and doctors are big fat liars. But studies show that the care patients receive is inversely proportional to the number of public patients served. That is, the more Medicaid patients an MD sees, the more patients she/he has to see in order to run the practice. As the patient load goes up.... the time the MD has to spend with patients goes down. Patients suffer and MD burnout is huge!
MDs limit the number of M and M's they see. They do this not because they are heartless creatures but because they must in order to provide the level of care they deem acceptable!--that patients deem acceptable!

FemiSex wants health care reform. But this is bill is a jumble without sound policy behind it. The bill sets us on a course similar to what is occurring in Massachusetts--a downward trajectory. Obama is a reparations president, but why in the world can he reparate [sic] with depreciating the middle class?