Obama chided the nation yet again in Kansas this week, saying: “some people thought massive inequality and exploitation was just the price of progress….a free license to take whatever you want from whoever you can.” Now meet Angel Adams, taker extraordinaire.

Meet single woman Angel Adams from the above video, who has birthed 15 children. She is plenty upset these days, as she and 12 of her kids are living in a motel room, saying:

Someone needs to pay for ALL my children and my suffering. Someone needs to be held accountable and THEY need to pay!"

In his Kansas speech demonising the Free Market Obama went on to say "when everyone engages in fair play, everyone gets a fair shot, everyone does their fair share."

I wonder if Mr. Obama would like to address those who play fair, in that they do not expect others to pay for ALLLLLL their children to be clothed, feed, schooled and housed. In fact those who turn over 30% or 40% or 50% of their pay to the government so that the government can tell Angel Adams that she is right, someone else must take responsibility for her as though she were a child and not a 37 year-old woman.
Fair share? Who the Hell is Obama kidding. When we talk about taxing people at 35% we are leaving out the massive taxes incurred at the state and local level, and property taxes and sales taxes and so many more taxes. Giving over to the feds a third or more of your income is more. should be more, than enough to pay for the common good services and temporary safety nets. It is not enough to pay for lifetime support though and that is the problem. Obama is advocating lifetime supports for those who refuse to take responsibility for their actions. Who pays the steepest price? Kids born to this cycle of dependency.

And to all those nice liberal MSM writers who have all that white guilt, it would be nice if you actually cared about what will become of these kids. No matter how much producers do for Angel Adams it will never be enough and her kids have so little chance of a good life.
But I would also challenge you to see the pain on their faces when they come into emergency departments with burns from abuse, or when they go on to shoot or get shot and are arrested or buried at 20 or the pain on other's faces who have been shot by kids without a future, who have lost a mom or dad to gang violence. Kids lost to foster care, kids left to grandmom whose own health is failing and who can never make up the two-parent household at risk, high risk kids need to have a shot at the good life.

Forking over more money is not the answer. It never will be. Watching kids like Angel's trot around after anyone who might notice their emotional neglect is truly heartbreaking. Seeing them in the ER delivering kids when they are barely 15 and then turning a blind eye to those kids as they've been raised to believe it is not their responsibility to care for them but like Angel says: someone out their has got to take responsibility for my actions.

Only thing is.... no one can take responsibility for another person's actions.

Liberals who write about poverty never get that. You can't make someone quit smoking who doesn't want to quite and you can't make a responsible parent out of someone who thinks other's must shoulder their burdens. Think. Would anyone like to be Angel's kid? Fuck no. No way. But those kids will love their mum. Why? Because they should. The whole thing is heartbreaking but it must be addressed. Obama should tell women Educate before you Procreate and not that the rich are cheap for not handing over more of their hard won gains. It really IS that simple. There just are not enough jobs for those lacking skill and education. Human capital must be nurtured, not mass produced. This is not the turn of the century when little government was in place. This is the 21st century and we have told women of certain demographic for far too long they are not responsible for their actions. And it is the children who are hurt by this massive mistake.

And those who make a nice living serving these "families" are kidding themselves. While you get paid to advocate for ever more of other people's money to raise, feed and nurture these kids, the kids themselves are stunted to a degree that no social service ever can fix.
No one is saying don't feed or clothe these kids. What we are saying is STOP telling them it is their due to have others provide for them.
All that does is create ever more suffering. Obama is leading this country down a very dangerous path. Collectivism is not the answer because eventually producers are worn out and down paying the bill for ALLLLLL those children. We need more producers not more heartbreaking tales of neglect and adult lifetime dependents.