Let’s talk sexism bias by the press? Compare coverage of Obama’s BiG FAT Lie on Earmarks to Palin’s Bride to Nowhere. And the Price of this Sexism Bias to Americans: a Trillion of so bucks, give or take a few billion.

“Understand, this bill does not have a single earmark in it, which is unprecedented for a bill of this size, does not have a single earmark in it," Obama said…er LIED as he spoke to Americans in an attempt to sell his Spending/stimulus Bill of Pork to Americans.

Now...Let’s time travel.

The media tackled Palin because of an earmark project (think bridge) that she ultimately rejected; the media never looked under the hood of Obama’s Massive $330 million earmark pork barrel for Illinois; they just hacked away on Palin.
Palin who rejected the bridge earmark that she’d originally found appealing. For whatever reasons, Palin had a change of heart on her states’ bridge earmark. (Obama had the SAME change of heart re his own earmarks as you’ll see below!) The media abhorred the fact Bush could never see the error of his ways, yet when a woman candidate had a change of heart over pork…the media treated her in the lash-the-vagina fashion that they used on both Clinton and Palin.

When Obama balls- out lied to the nation saying
Read my Lips: No New Earmarks,
the press didn’t turn up the heat on Obama and call him a Liar in the fashion they did to the female candidate.

Palin said she rejected the Bridge to Nowhere, leaving out the fact that she had once supported this earmark. Our President, did something 15,000 times more grievous:
As a candidate He said he was against earmarks, then as potus he poured billions of dollars worth of Pork into the most massive spending this country has every seen and …and…and…has the Gall to Balls-OUT LIE to the citizens of this country, saying that there is NO Pork in his bill…
“UNDERSTAND, THIS BILL DOES NOT HAVE A SINGLE EARMARK IN IT,” LIED Obama to the nation.

If you believe Mr. Obama, then Dorothy we are in South Side Chicago now.
AP has ( soflty)called Obama out on this LIE, by saying “the projects bear the prime characteristics of pork - tailored to benefit specific interests or to have thinly disguised links to local projects.”

Politfact and ProPublica also found earmarks in this bill, with ProPublica’s “An Earmark by Any Other Name,” listing billions upon billions of Pork Pie in the Spending/stimulus Bill. (all links provided below)

But…the White House Says:

There are no earmarks" in the stimulus bill.
Robert Gibbs on Monday, February 2nd, 2009 in a comment at the daily White House press briefing.

So Obama and his administration are lying to Americans, filling us up on Fatty Pork, as they laugh in the backroom. “Shit are those Dumb Americans gullible, just like with Bush, we can Say Anything and they’ll believe it.”

Of course, just like with Bush’s lies, the Million $ question is: why is the Media not thrashing Obama on his Big FAT Pork Lie, when they flogged Palin for her ultimate rejection of a pork project that she had once supported????

Why can a woman not get away with being honest; but Obama get away with bald-faced lies???? Palin said she said no to the Bride to Nowhere, and she Did say NO; but b/c she decided not to say I ULTIMATELY said no, vs., I said no, she was treated like Pond Scum.
Obama simply lies through his teeth and his lies are left on the floor to die. No massive Media Uprising to bring down Obama like we witnessed with Palin.

Palin’s brige was Pork, and Femisex wrote that this is what is expected of both Governors and Senators and House members: Bring the Bacon home to their states. That is why we didn’t hammer on Obama’s Massive $330 million Illinois PORK Perks that he pushed for and got as a senator. Femisex understood Palin’s and Obama’s need to indulge in Pork. But It WAS ONLY Palin who ultimately had the good sense to send some of the Bad Bacon back.

Today CNN’s Roland Obama Martin wrote this about Obama’s Porky Pie Stimulus Bill:
“but I firmly believe that the folks at home love to send their members of Congress to bring the bacon back home.”

Last September, Femisex wrote this re earmarks:

Joe and Jane Public understand pols have to bring home the bacon to their states…Obama is in for some 310 million last year. And they understand how things shift when one moves from mayor to governor to veep candidate or Pres. Candidate.

We went on to show that Obama before his bid for Potus, Obama had requested 112 earmarks totaling more than $330 million in taxpayer funds for his state. But as a candidate, he’d requested Zero. (that change of heart we referred to eariler.)

The tap dance that media does to spin for and protect THEIR GUY is astounding. The media now wants everyone to ignore Obama’s Big Earmark Lie and they won’t cover it as a LIE.
In fact the press is so busy making excuses for Obo’s Big Lie they are tripping up and all over themselves. (example Martin now {obama} vs then {Palin} on earmarks)
With Palin it was a DIFFERENT STORY. The media took every opportunity to call her a Liar when in fact she had told the truth, but failed to say that ULTIMATELY she rejected the Bridge to Nowhere. I’ll give anyone a dollar who has Not heard about Palin’s bridge to nowhere. But try to find a guy on the street who knows that Obama LIED to Americans about earmark spending in his bill. Good luck on that!

So this is the time to think about how the media harms us. We now have more Pork Pie than any American would have dreamed possible, and we have the media failing to tell us our President has, in FACT, lied to us about it!!!!!!!!!!!! Instead we have CNN showboating the inane Mr. Roland Martin on why we don’t care about Obots Big Fat Lie.

Poor Mr. Martin, he would defend Mr. Obama come hell or highwater, but really why read or listen to a thing he says, cause we already know the answer: if the president does it it’s legal—hmmm where have we heard that before????????????? Hint Nixon. Can you imagine if CNN covered Nixon in the fashion of Obama??? Hey, we’d still have the guy as our potus and monuments and airports would be named after Nixon.
Where is objective non-sexist media?
In the backroom, measuring their penile length as female media wannabes watch in utter penis envy and ask how they may please their masters. Another ruler with your coffee, sir? Can we please write something if we Promise to write it nice-like re Obama and we promise to write the nasty on female candidates who run for potus?
Can we, can we??? Please. Ok, thanks, and what?? Oh..yes, my first assignment is to write about Palin’s Bridge to Nowhere. Got it. But what about Mr. Obama’s $330 million in earmarks?? He says he doesn’t like earmarks, but maybe we should question that cause if he wins, he does have a history of liking that thar EARMark. Oh, sorry, yeah, your coffee, and yes, I’ll rush right out to buy you another ruler. Yeah, and the copy on Palin will be sufficiently cat-fight nasty, Just the Way you like it Mr. Big.

Links:
http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/statements/2009/feb/04/robert-gi...

http://www.propublica.org/special/earmark-creep-in-the-stimulus-package-...
http://www.propublica.org/feature/welcome-in-the-stimulus-bill-an-earmar...

http://voices.washingtonpost.com/capitol-briefing/2009/02/did_obama_tell...

http://hotair.com/archives/2009/02/10/ap-about-obamas-no-pork-assertion/

http://www.cnn.com/2009/POLITICS/03/04/martin.earmarks/index.html

http://www.femisex.com/content/just-too-damn-funny%E2%80%94journalists-b...