 
SearchFemiStatsWomen to men
157.2 million
The number of females in the United States as of Oct. 1, 2010. The number of males is 153.2 million.
Source: US Census Bureau
Earnings, women to men
$36,278
The median annual earnings of women 15 or older who worked year-round, full time, in 2009, up 1.9 percent from $35,609 in 2008 (after adjusting for inflation). Women earned 77 cents for every $1 earned by men, unchanged for several years running.
Source: US Census Bureau
Education, women to men
35%
Percentage of women 25 to 29 who had obtained a bachelor's degree or more as of 2009, which exceeded that of men in this age range—27%.
55%
Percentage of college students in fall 2008 who were women.
58%
Percentage of women 25 to 29 who held advanced degrees in 2009, which exceed that of men in this age range—42%.
Source: Educational Attainment in the United States: 2009
Political representation, women to men 112th Congress
16.8%
Percentage of women in Congress.
17
Number of women out of 100 U.S. Senators
74
Number of women out of 435 U.S. Representatives. (3 are Delegates) (Of the 74 women in the House, 50 are Democrats, including the 3 Delegates, and 24 are Republicans. Of the 17 women serving in the Senate, 12 are Democrats and 5 are Republicans.)
Source: Congressional Research Service
Rapes or sexual assault against women, 2007
248,300
The majority of US citizens are women; Women are more highly educated in the U.S; Women are continually paid less--by almost 25 percent--than men. Despite a vast pipeline of women in the professional workforce, they are relegated to non-alpha positions. Women are given miniscule representation in government even as they are the majority of the population. Women are largely relegated (most often by so-called progressives) to represent only Democrats in Congress. A staggering national assault occurs daily against women’s bodies with scant attention paid by male-dominated media.
Source: U.S. Dept. of Justice
More FemiStats Links
Must Reads!
Phoebe Prince is dead and Liberal Dude Nation refuses to say whyMonday, May 9, 2011 at 10:56 pm — admin
tiny piece on A25. not front page story of the larger issue which you'd have to be deaf dumb and blind to not get. Not just the NYTimes has their head up their liberal dude nation ass. Slate has disappointed as usual. Not a Word about the larger issue ...only a wonderment at why the charges were filed in the first place:
How is it possible that Emily Bazelon could write such a trite unquestioning piece. The question is obvious: what were these teens doing that is not taught to them as OK every night of the week on prime time TV and by those in power such as Bill Maher, nevermind in the NYTimes White Bitch catcall to Hillary. What a shame. When women make us mad we are allowed to torment them with slut and bitch and whore, cause the media tells us it is OK and the media won't admit that sad little fact about themselves. Alas, let's remember it was the gals at State that put Palin in a bikini and sexed her up so that young kids everywhere learn what to do with women then don't like, those Irish sluts. That the New York Times won't in all it's male glory ask this question is sad, but the fact that Emily won't is tragic. http://www.slate.com/id/2293112/ http://www.nytimes.com/2011/05/05/us/05bully.html?_r=1&scp=1&sq=two%20st... |
|
Comments
House Negro female journos
House Negro female journos
Many female journalists will
Many female journalists will not understand the story that is here because they are too busy calling other women bitches and whores themselves.
FAILURE by women journalists
FAILURE by women journalists to give a nod to the larger issues at play is sickening, puke inducing, cowardly and pathetic.
Post new comment