Rachel Maddow: Social Media can replace much of what Journalists do. HA ha ha, or not do!

And the Oscar for most dangerous statement of the year goes to the befuddled Rachel Maddow who states that gee whiz whillikers dat dem gem Obama doesn’t have to answer to professional journalists so much because he preaches to the masses using social media. Snicker my Fritz, dat dem dumb Missy Maddow should have worked for Chairman Mao!

Missy Maddow holds up submitted questions to Parents magazine that Joe Biden answered as a great example access to power. Ha, try to get a question answered that they don’t want to answer and good luck with that. Ha and no follow-up by a fully informed journalist…as least when such things actually existed. What better way to work a dictatorship that only take questions you know in advance, questions you can answer in full spin and without the pesky journalist power to refute those spun answers in your paper or TV broadcast. But the reality of journalism that MSM practices in deference to Chairman Obama is just like that of questions submitted on Facebook: they ask a “hard” question; the pres or his veep or other admin folks spin to their liking and no one, no where calls them out on the lies that they spin!

As a dreary example: Obama said this back when it mattered, in the fall in the 3rd debate against Mitt Romney:
“The sequester is not something that I’ve proposed,” Obama said. “It is something that Congress has proposed.”

MSM: crickets not a word and not a Candy Crowley moment from the male Democrat moderator Bob Shiffer to say: Liar liar pants on fire Mr. President. (Actually, Candy Dumb Bunny lied to Americans and said Obama did specifically call Benghazi a terrorist attack when he did not! But all serve the KING so say the write crowd{sic pun intened.})

Bob Woodward, only now, too late to make it matter, that is AFTER the election, has ver publically announced that Obama is a total fucking liar and the HE birthed the bad boy angry baby that is the Sequester. Where was he on the talk show circuit back in Oct of 2012? Not on Meet the Press saying liar you is Mr. President.

Here is Bob Woodward now that it is TOO late to matter:

“ My extensive reporting for my book “The Price of Politics” shows that the automatic spending cuts were initiated by the White House and were the brainchild of Lew and White House congressional relations chief Rob Nabors — probably the foremost experts on budget issues in the senior ranks of the federal government.
Obama personally approved of the plan for Lew and Nabors to propose the sequester to Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-Nev.). They did so at 2:30 p.m. July 27, 2011, according to interviews with two senior White House aides who were directly involved.
Nabors has told others that they checked with the president before going to see Reid.”


And here is our story on this:

If Mitt were in and Obama were out we’d have real change in Washington and a solutions person in the Oval Office not some cheep {sic} sleazy polarizing jackass, who lies and lies and lies some more to get middle class folks to pay the fuck up, if you please.

Now for best Laugh of Stupid Suspension of Disbelief, the Oscar goes to Chuck Todd of NBC saying nah ah, there is no bias that favors Democrats from the MSM. Even my toddler know better, Master Chuckles.

Here is some insightful reading on this issue from Commentary

Politico writers Jim Vandehei and Mike Allen are on to something with their feature published today about President Obama’s mastery of the mainstream media. Their conclusion that the president and his staff have broken new ground in manipulating journalists and shaping favorable coverage of the administration is so obvious that it is almost inarguable. As I have argued several times over the past four years, no president since John F. Kennedy has enjoyed the sort of advantage or lack of serious scrutiny that the president has received. Vandehei and Allen are right when they point out that the calculated leaks, softball interview combined with a command of social media and other methods that limit press access have combined to build the Obama juggernaut that won him re-election as well as give him an edge in any battle with Congress.


Yes, and from what I hear, Obama is punishing Politico for their story that finds Obama is manipulating media coverage. HA. What a bunch of morons. Ever hear of you made this Obama bed, now bend the fuck over jackasses.

Other links:
How much press did this get if you’re just hearing about it now! http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/fact-checker/post/obamas-fanciful-cl...

Maddow Mess: http://www.realclearpolitics.com/video/2013/02/20/maddow_white_house_mak...

oh such a hard question, not followed by a story that shows the lies told or lacking any follow up qs by informed journos.


Dear Mr. Obama why did

Dear Mr. Obama why did repeatedly lie to voters, saying the sequester was not your idea when it was? Answer the question please. No that, Mr. president is a lie again as the record will show. Tomorrow Rachel Madcow will excuse your lies. Today please answer the question. And on follow up: if you lied about that why should we believe a word you say now or in the future?

Post new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <a> <em> <strong> <cite> <code> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd> <blockquote>
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.

More information about formatting options

This question is for testing whether you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.