Let’s start with this Liberal Dude Nation bullshit from an item on sexual assault that ran in the Times on Dec.13, 2011:

Experts have long debated whether rape should be seen as an act of aggression and control or the product of an irresistible sexual urge.

Really? Now? In this day and age? Is the Times fucking kidding us? Who are these experts that would propound that rapes occur because a horny dude can’t go home a whack off? Of yeah, Mike Tyson was their resident expert? Un-F-ing-beLIEable.

Who on this fucking planet would deny that rape is not an act of control and aggression. What nimnut liberal dude nation writer or editor would say such BULLSHIT. Funny thing. When our two year old walked in on mommy and daddy having intercourse one morning, my husband did not continue to pump away and in a nanosecond we’d stopped our whoopee to pretend we’d been “wrassling it up” for fun. What dumbnimnut would suggest anyone might not be able to control their sexual urge in such a situation? Why on earth would a Times writer even suggest there was ANY credibility to the claim rape is about Horn out of control? Really.

That is why the Paper is nothing but idiot making some many days of the week. Is lynching an act of aggression and control or the product of an irresistible social urge? There is nothing irresistible about lynching or raping. BUT ONLY THE NEW YORK STUPID TIMES, LIBERAL DUDE NATION SEXIST TIMES, WOULD SUGGEST RAPE IS AN IRRESISTIBLE URGE. THEY WOULD NEVER SAY THE SAME OUT ANY OTHER HATE CRIME, SAY A LYNCHING OR A GAY BEAT DOWN.

The NYTimes has become a national embarrassment.

http://www.nytimes.com/2011/12/13/health/the-twice-victimized-of-sexual-...