Slate's XX Factor, a moment of hope, dashed by two of shame

On any given day, one thing is as certain as gravity. The XX Factor on Slate will feature the Male Top Editors stable of cherry-pricked XX women writers trash talking Palin. A few short months ago these same women (“liberals” all, so they say) cut Hillary to shreds with the words and fonts of their own self-loathing discontent.

I occasionally comment on the sexist, misogynistic things these female-loathing, male-adoring gals write. And yes, I do have massive Horror in my soul for Missy Dahlia Lithwick, the woman who hates her femaleness so much she lashes out at any female who dare find herself without the shredded self-esteem that so obviously plagues Missy Dahlia.

But …stop the presses, hold the phones and float gravity-free out of ur chairs for the briefest of moments. I just encountered this on the XX factor:
----------
One Nasty Palin Rumor Debunked, by Rachael Larimore

• When I'd read that Wasilla, during Sarah Palin's mayoral tenure, had a practice of charging victims for their "rape kits"—the forensic examination required to gather evidence against the perpetrator—I was as horrified as anyone else. The explanation that it was the policy of the local police chief doing the billing, and even a quote by a Democratic member of the state legislature that Palin probably knew nothing about the policy, brought little comfort. At the same time, it just didn't make any sense, so I tempered my horror with skepticism.
Fortunately, it turns out that skepticism wins the day. Thanks to very thorough debunkings by bloggers Charlie Martin of Explorations and Bob Owens of Confederate Yankee, we can put this bit of nastiness to rest.
First off, the Wasilla police chief, Charlie Fannon, is on record as having tried to bill victims' insurance companies, not the victims themselves, for the rape kits. In other towns in Alaska, hospitals were trying to bill victims, prompting an Alaska state law forbidding the practice. If this practice still seems creepy or exclusive to macho, rough-and-tumble Alaska, well, it happens to be the practice in other states, too, like North Carolina (until recently) and ... Illinois.
Some conservative bloggers are trying to play "gotcha" and point out that Barack Obama co-sponsored a bill in the Illinois state senate that provides state money to cover services provided to victims who have neither state aid or insurance, meaning that Illinois also tries to get insurance companies to pay up, just like little ol' Wasilla. Best I can tell from my rudimentary reading of the Illinois code, Obama co-sponsored an amendment to existing legislation that already had the insurance clause in there, and the amendment had nothing to do with rape kits. So, I'm not going to engage in gotcha-ism. We could play that game all day long.
What bothers me is that, while the media has been quick to investigate and shoot down every claim that Sarah Palin makes—that she stopped the Bridge to Nowhere, that she opposes earmarks—the nasty rumors are taken at face value. It takes bloggers, working on their own time and with tools no fancier than Google, to figure out that she's not personally sending bills for $1,200 to traumatized rape victims and that no, she did NOT cut funding for teen mothers, unless you define "cut" as not providing as much of a budget increase as had been had asked for (same with funding "cuts" for Catholic Charities and the Special Olympics).

-------------------
I was thrilled and astounded to see this honest piece on the XX Factor. All the negative and positive spin is gone and readers get what they want from MSM—an honest accounting. My only complaint is that Ms. Larimore fails to note that the “nasty rumors” are media-fueled.
That is, the Media themselves are putting out spun stories on Palin in the fashion of a negative campaign ad. Yet hats off to u Ms. Larimore. But that just means you will not get to publish as much as Missy woman-hater Dahlia.

BUT ….Folks, don’t get to excited about the sudden halt of hate for women by women on the XX Factor. Just scroll down a bit and you get this from Miss D:
---
“Are we really going to condemn the McCain campaign for treating her as an object, with demands that they “free” her? I understand why smart women in the media are enraged with Palin’s refusal to engage them. It’s appalling. But I don’t think it’s good for women to direct that rage at her male keepers, handlers, or advisers, either.”
-------

Poor Missy BJgivernchief Dahlia Lithwick, she jumps like a dog thru a hoop at every chance to call Palin appalling and strike sexist sticks in all women’s hearts by telling us Palin has Male keepers.

Gov. Palin looks to me like a woman who has tolerated no Keepers Missy D, while you are the epitome of a woman Kept by Male Publishers. Missy D’s male handlers are the Top edit men at Slate and the very sexist Jon Meacham of Newsweek, who Handles and Minds, and Keeps his women away from writing about politics unless they have been fully inculcated into his Program of Thought. Newsweek is about as anti-feminist a place as downtown Riyadh.

And then just below Missy D’s item, we get…Ta DA!...
-----------
Vampire Vixen by another XX Factor anti-feminist Hanna Rosin

• “There is an amazing photo spread across this morning's Washington Times of Sarah Palin, shot from behind the head of Colombian President Alvaro Uribe. (Sadly, I can't find it online). Palin, radiating confidence, looks like she wants to ravish him, if not suck his blood. Now we got absolutely no actual information out of this foreign affairs speed dating. ("It was fine," said Hamid Karzai. And: "We talked a lot about a lot of things.") So we are not insulting her to say it was just an image building exercise. And the image conveyed by this photo, featured in a friendly conservative paper is: That is one MANSLAYING v.p. candidate we got.
This, plus the "Hottest VP" buttons, plus the action figure in a miniskirt, makes one suspect that conservatives are promoting the sexy Christian girl image rather than offended by it, as they claim to be. “

-------------
THANK GOODNESS WOMEN HAVE ROSIN TO TELL US WHAT A BLOOD-SUCKING nasty Palin is and to diminish the Governor’s meeting with a head of state as nothing more than speed dating.

By the Way, can Missy Rosin get me some coffee… and one of those yummy jelly doughnuts? Thanks, Missy H, now get ur sad-sack male-worshipping ass back to the 60s and shut UP!

http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/
September 24th 08

Also.. NOT TO BE MISSED or Forgotten....Appalling sexist comments of Missy Dahlia aimed at Hillary supporters, calling us Harridans who ask for the violence she inflicts see:

http://femisex.com/content/%E2%80%9Chillary-harridans%E2%80%9D-and-other...

Comments

How informative and revealing

How informative and revealing that "proudwoman" is able to tell us all about the problem that "most women" have with Sarah Palin.Not being as omniscient as she I am only able to account for my own feelings, those of my acquaintance and the fact every poll that I've seen tells me that women have substantially gravitated to McCain since he selected her.These, while no doubt less authentic than proudwoman's ideological imperatives tell me that it is she and not Palin who represents the minority. The notion that what is considered received orthodoxy in their immediate circle of friends and in the incestious bog of liberal elitism is mainstream has long been a failing of elitists of all stripes and left wing elitists in particular.That is no doubt one of the reasons that they are so consistently unsuccessful in pursuing their goals electorally and instead rely on judicial appointments to advance their cramped agenda through the judicial system

Much as I hate to do it, I

Much as I hate to do it, I have to agree with Campbell Browne that the McCain campaign is at least appearing to be sexist in their treatment of Sarah Palin. I found an article entitled "The Dumbing Down of Sarah Palin" buried on www.realclearpolitics.com yesterday that I thought was spot on on this subject. Link: http://www.marstonchronicles.info/index.php?option=com_content&task=view....

The problem that most women

The problem that most women have with Palin is not that she is a woman. The fact is that she represents a very small fraction of most American women. She want to put women's progressive movements back 100 years. It is also infuriating that given how many women are qualified to run as VP or POTUS, McCain picks her. OMG! To say that this woman is intelligent and sophisticated is ludricous. She is like a woman straight out of some redneck holler that thinks that she is right on every issue and that it is her way or no way. Bush in drag. But to be fair, I will name the pros and cons supporting Palin.
Cons
Against freedom of choice for women. Even in cases of rape or incest.
Is proud to be a member of NRA. (radicals)
Thinks it is sporting to shoot wolves and bears from planes.(Barbaric)
Had affair with husband's business partner.
Belongs to extreme right wing evangelical church where they speak in tongues and stone their children.
Was all for bridge to nowhere before congress backed off it.
Tried to have books banned from library. (Censorship like in USSR)
Had bro in laws boss fired when he wouldn't fire bil.
Thinks being neighbors w/Russia gives her foreign experience. ROTFL

PROS
Can actually stand beside McCain and throw out Bush's soundbites without laughing or gagging. That takes real talent.

the above comment is chock

the above comment is chock full of uninformed distortions that only a true "redneck holler" would write it. sorry, but, this is the truth.
publishing falsehoods is just not worthy, shame on u "proudwoman"
repeating untruths is just NOT Cool, and conjures up the backwoods mindset u profess to hate. it sadly conjures up the current Press Pack, so i will publish this letter but...only to showcase the similarity it has with the unprofessional status of my profession!
i won't answer all ur charges but.. to pick just one: "barbaric" is factory farming where animals are tortured their entire lives. hunting, while not my stichk, is by comparison, a MUCH lesser evil, i assure u. abbottoirs are very nasty places i assure u!

and...how an accomplished woman in the veep slot would set women back 100 years is beyond the pale of this site. clearly u don't work in corporate american as a female. and if you say MOST women, be sure to back this up with evidence! some thing utterly lacking in ur post!

Post new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <a> <em> <strong> <cite> <code> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd> <blockquote>
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.

More information about formatting options

CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.

wt