Time Magazine to Obama: I LOVE YOU MAN; covers up fact G.W. Bush intel got U.S. bin Laden and Obama is a flip Flopper

fred_armisen.jpg

Time magazine has become a laughing stock under the puerile guidance of managing editor Richard Stengel, who I can say has the intellect of an iguana. Now let’s cut to an example of why NO ONE reads Time anymore: In an effort to re-elect their boy toy Barky they did an issue on “look how cool our boy Barky is because he allowed men with guns to shoot Bin Fuckladin.” In an effort to lie to their readers and suggest that G.W. Bush had nothing to do with the capture and kill of bin FuckLaden, Time put this header...

on one of the stories they did about how cool is that black dude who offed bin Fuckladen: “By the Time Barack Obama Became President, the Trail to Osama Bin Laden Had Long Gone Cold.” Well shiver me timbers but that is a Bald Face Lie.
The lamestream media constantly tries to hide from the public this

FACT: It was under Bush’s policy’s of detainee interrogation that we got Bin Laden. It was intel gained from captured al-Qaeda members at Gitmo using enhanced interrogation methods (sleep deprivation, waterboarding, lack of clothing) that identified the name Abu Ahmed al-Kuwaiti. This was a messenger to/for bin Laden. The CIA immediately monitored calls for any reference to this man and when another al-Qaeda called him up one day, using his name, CIA knew they’d found bin Laden’s message boy.

They just followed the message boy to bin Laden and then Obama was given the option to have Nave Seals risk their lives to kill the turd that was bin Laden. Don’t believe me: take it from the NYTimes, as they sorta havta admit (as they have in the past) in a book review of “Manhunt” by Peter Bergen. Only…notice the great Pains the foolish Times writer/editor takes to conceal the fact the intel came under Bush and because of his enhanced interrogation policies:

http://www.nytimes.com/2012/05/04/books/manhunt-by-peter-l-bergen-about-...

By 2009, he goes on, they had become increasingly certain that he was living in some kind of urban setting, and from their reading of Bin Laden biographies, which underscored how devoted he was to his wives and children, they also suspected that it was possible that he was living with them, perhaps in a “sizable compound.”
Using intelligence gathered from captured Qaeda members, the C.I.A. began to focus on the courier Abu Ahmed al-Kuwaiti, who turns out to have been transporting letters and computer thumb drives from Bin Laden. As Mr. Bergen tells it, their interest was heightened by the efforts of the 9/11 mastermind Khalid Sheikh Mohammed and another high-ranking Qaeda leader to play down the courier’s importance. After the Kuwaiti, as he was known, received a call from a friend in the Persian Gulf who was being monitored by United States intelligence, a C.I.A. asset was able to locate him and track him to the Abbottabad site.

--
As you read along you would think the intel came during Obama’s time in office circa 2009. Ha! This is sad and very deceptive and the Times has reported in the past the intel on the messenger/courier came about because of Bush and under his tenure.

Now let’s return to the Time issue on the anniversary of bin Laden’s death that never once mentions that Obama was ONLY able to find and have Seals kill binFuckladen because of intel gathered under Bush. (Remember it was Bush who said we will smoke em out! And he was right, Only it was Barky who got to tap dance on bin Laden’s grave.)

In Time magazine the foolish writers actually say: “Summarized in a single line, the takeaway from the bin Laden operation is that American Government worked.”

Time says this to mock Richard Clark, a counterterrorism expert who famously said after al-Qadea killed some 3,000 souls on American soil: “Your government failed you.”

But NEVER would Time allow readers to know it was the G.W. Bush Government that worked in terms of finding bin Laden. And if Obama had been president at the time of the attacks, we would most likely not have any decent intel and al-Queda would be sleeping on ivy-down pillows eating chicken three times a day…to quote a movie line I recall.

Obama is a punk. And no matter how many feature stores Time I Heart Obama does on the killing of bin Laden, nothing they can say or NOT say, will change this fact. It take HARD work and HARD choices of set up an entire post-attack intelligence-gathering operation, a special prison to quarantine al-Qaeda at, and a global network of spies to do the constant surveillance that found the messenger that led us to bin Laden. It took one boring meet and greet with militaries leaders to hear the news they’d finally found bin Laden and anyone who was not BRAIN DEAD would have said, shoot that tall skinny shithead, as did Obama. That is ALL Barky did, and now all that he can do is bark and bark and bark about it and then spend millions to fly over the Afghanistan to remind us how great He Obama is for what…..exactly?
Obama is the guy who steals other kid’s homework and turns it in to the teacher with a big toothy smile on his lying face.

Now that said…Let’s all have another good laugh at the pathetic ObamaMachineMedia as evidenced by today’s NYTimes header: Obama Endorses Same Sex Marriage, Taking Stand On Charged Social Issue. HAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA
When Romney changed his mind on abortion he is dubbed a flip flopper and a man without conviction who will blow anyway the political wind whips.
But Obama….when, after playing dodge ball with gay marriage—he was for it, against it, sorta for it, maybe for it, now definitely maybe for it, but still let the states decide…when Obama flip and flops more times than a Mexican Jumping Bean, then HE is “taking a stand.” Laugh out Loud. How dumb are we supposed to be, anyway?

I don’t care if you are for or against gays getting hitched, there is NO way that Obama is anything other than a political animal who is trying to get the most votes he can and flipping and a flopped like he did with the Mandate for Heath Care Insurance that he was against before he was for it and like when he was for a crackdown on radioactive wastewater until he got a whole buncho$$ from the men who make radioactive waste water and then he was for it, but lied about that to voters saying he’d always be against it and passed laws on the matter and …oh, yeah he was for Rev. Wright until he was against Rev. Wright and …he was for Freedom of Choice Act until he was against it…and he was against killing wolves until he ordered the creatures shot in Wyoming and …this could go on a long time…

Memo to Socialist who have take over the Democrat Party: We are not THAT stupid.

Comments

It's simple. No Bush Jr. in

It's simple. No Bush Jr. in White House no killing of binLaden. I didn't vote for 43 but I'm smart enough to understand facts. Obama was totally unnecessary to bin Laden's demise.

Shuuush now children and I'll

Shuuush now children and I'll tell you a strory. Big bad Bush well maybe he did lead Barry to Bin Laden. But that doesn't fit with the way we WANT things to be so we will tell you our version of the truth, which always Plays like this: Obama good Bush bad you are too dumb to tell when we ate lying to u.

LMAO Taking a stand?? Biden

LMAO
Taking a stand?? Biden and Obama orchestrated this to get it out of the way months before the November election. And O No didnt take a stand, he did a version of don't ask don't tell with his states' right flipflop.
One and Done Barky- bye bye Barky-:)

Post new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <a> <em> <strong> <cite> <code> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd> <blockquote>
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.

More information about formatting options

CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.

wt