 
SearchFemiStatsWomen to men
157.2 million
The number of females in the United States as of Oct. 1, 2010. The number of males is 153.2 million.
Source: US Census Bureau
Earnings, women to men
$36,278
The median annual earnings of women 15 or older who worked year-round, full time, in 2009, up 1.9 percent from $35,609 in 2008 (after adjusting for inflation). Women earned 77 cents for every $1 earned by men, unchanged for several years running.
Source: US Census Bureau
Education, women to men
35%
Percentage of women 25 to 29 who had obtained a bachelor's degree or more as of 2009, which exceeded that of men in this age range—27%.
55%
Percentage of college students in fall 2008 who were women.
58%
Percentage of women 25 to 29 who held advanced degrees in 2009, which exceed that of men in this age range—42%.
Source: Educational Attainment in the United States: 2009
Political representation, women to men 112th Congress
16.8%
Percentage of women in Congress.
17
Number of women out of 100 U.S. Senators
74
Number of women out of 435 U.S. Representatives. (3 are Delegates) (Of the 74 women in the House, 50 are Democrats, including the 3 Delegates, and 24 are Republicans. Of the 17 women serving in the Senate, 12 are Democrats and 5 are Republicans.)
Source: Congressional Research Service
Rapes or sexual assault against women, 2007
248,300
The majority of US citizens are women; Women are more highly educated in the U.S; Women are continually paid less--by almost 25 percent--than men. Despite a vast pipeline of women in the professional workforce, they are relegated to non-alpha positions. Women are given miniscule representation in government even as they are the majority of the population. Women are largely relegated (most often by so-called progressives) to represent only Democrats in Congress. A staggering national assault occurs daily against women’s bodies with scant attention paid by male-dominated media.
Source: U.S. Dept. of Justice
More FemiStats Links
Must Reads!
Two Prominent Democrats Whack Mr. Obama for ginning up racismSunday, August 1, 2010 at 10:01 pm — admin
If you think the above was comment from Fox News think again. The quote came out in a recent WSJ op-ed and was penned by these two confirmed liberals: "Mr. Caddell served as a pollster for President Jimmy Carter. Mr. Schoen, who served as a pollster for President Bill Clinton, is the author of "The Political Fix" (Henry Holt, 2010). " More:
If you don't get that Mr. Obama is the MOST divisive president living Americans have ever experienced, you must be living on Mars. What cracks me up is the NYTimes finds no fault with Mr. Obama's tactic of racial warfare but cast hate on Fox for this:
link: Folks, the Acorn story that the NYTIMES refused, yes refused to cover did not just appear to show, it DID SHOW ACORN giving advice on how to evade taxes when turning underage girls into sex slaves. Folks raise your hand if you think for one second that the NYTIMES gives a shit about women if that means harming THE ONE, even in a sideways way. They were willing to hide coverage of complicity in a sex slave trade in order to protect their socialist president...aka the black dude who saved them from Hillary. The Times actually faults FOX for giving the story media attention. For the Times, when minorities conspire to commit crimes against underage girls, liberalism means something very different than what I once believed. |
|
Comments
I watched Meet the Press this
I watched Meet the Press this weekend and it was very interesting to hear Mr. Greenspan say that in his entire life he'd never seen such discord between private enterprise and an Administration. Mr. Obama seems to forget that government in a democracy can't function without private enterprise. A poll by the Economist now finds that 55% of Americans describe Barack Obama as a socialist.
I think Mr. Greenspan was
I think Mr. Greenspan was pretty honest yesterday, saying that tax cuts on borrowed money is insane policy. Very true! Greenspan also appeared to be completely flabbergasted at Barack's war on business. I also think that BHO is our most divisive president in memory. Clearly Mr. Greenspan felt the same thing, only he said so more diplomatically.
Regarding the New York Times story they were dismissive of the Black Panther Voter intimidation case (the fact that Obama's Justice boys won't press charges and in fact specifically allow the offenders to be back at the polls in time for 2012--a very powerful message that the Black Panthers can do the same thing in 2012 and not be held accountable.) But if we are going to move into a post racial era we won't get there by giving a pass to people of color who break the law.
Ya know, as far as the Acorn
Ya know, as far as the Acorn controversy goes, I see so many liberal bloggers (such as Shakesville) that I otherwise love now mocking the story as a non-controversy. I just don't get it.
Well, my prediction is that the whole "you're a racist if you don't support Obama's job creation bill!" etc. etc. is going to come back to bite the Democratic party in the bottom. So many Americans are getting sick of being called a racist constantly! And yes, we do know that their is real racism to deal with in America but unfortunately the Demcoratic party is not doing much to combat THAT.
Sigh. It's not like I'm in love with Republicans but I am sincerely tired of the abuse by the Dems. There's no automatic voting based on party on my part anymore.
Fox’s news programs covered
Fox’s news programs covered the story extensively.
I never thought I'd live to see the day that the New York Times is complaining about a news organization covering a story that caught ppl conspiring to traffic 13 year-old girls as sex slaves.
This is another great catch by Femisex on the culture of sexism that exists at the Times. In their urgency to protect an extremely privileged black male the Times has become resentful of news coverage that exposes deep seated sexism in our society, sexism that is perhaps even more prevalent in minority communities.
Post new comment